Abstract:Local social interactions among individuals in animal groups generate collective behavior, allowing groups to adjust to changing conditions. Historically, scientists from different disciplines have taken different approaches to modeling collective behavior. We describe how each can contribute to the goal of understanding natural systems. Simple bottom-up models that describe individuals and their interactions directly have demonstrated that local interactions far from equilibrium can generate collective states. However, such simple models are not likely to describe accurately the actual mechanisms and interactions in play in any real biological system. Other classes of top-down models that describe group-level behavior directly have been proposed for groups where the function of the collective behavior is understood. Such models cannot necessarily explain why or how such functions emerge from first principles. Because modeling approaches have different strengths and weaknesses and no single approach will always be best, we argue that models of collective behavior that are aimed at understanding real biological systems should be formulated to address specific questions and to allow for validation. As examples, we discuss four forms of collective behavior that differ both in the interactions that produce the collective behavior and in ecological context, and thus require very different modeling frameworks. 1) Harvester ants use local interactions consisting of brief antennal contact, in which one ant assesses the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of another, to regulate foraging activity, which can be modeled as a closed-loop excitable system. 2) Arboreal turtle ants form trail networks in the canopy of the tropical forest, using trail pheromone; one ant detects the volatile chemical that another has recently deposited. The process that maintains and repairs the trail, which can be modeled as a distributed algorithm, is constrained by the physical configuration of the network of vegetation in which they travel. 3) Swarms of midges interact acoustically and non-locally, and can be well described as agents moving in an emergent potential well that is representative of the swarm as a whole rather than individuals. 4) Flocks of jackdaws change their effective interactions depending on ecological context, using topological distance when traveling but metric distance when mobbing. We discuss how different research questions about these systems have led to different modeling approaches.

Modeling the Emergence of Modular Leadership Hierarchy During the Collective Motion of Herds Made of Harems

Follow the Leader: Herding Behavior in Heterogeneous Populations

Research on Group Behavior Modeling and Individual Interaction Modes with Informed Leaders

Dynamical properties of the herding voter model with and without noise

Harem size should be measured by more than the sum of its parts: Phenology‐based measurements reveal joint effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on a polygamous herbivore under non‐stationary climatic conditions

Extending Group Dynamics Models: Incorporating Heterogeneous Networks to Analyze Cooperative Behaviors and Collective Intelligence in Biological Groups

Understanding Herding Based on a Co-Evolutionary Model for Strategy and Game Structure

Emergence of leader-follower hierarchy among players in an on-line experiment

The Evolution of Complexity in Social Organization - A Model Using Dominance-Subordinate Behaviour in Two Social Wasp Species

Herd Behavior In A Complex Adaptive System

The Emergence of Lines of Hierarchy in Collective Motion of Biological Systems

Cucker-Smale Flocking under Rooted Leadership with Fixed and Switching Topologies

A Selfish Herd with a Target

Control of the socio-economic systems using herding interactions

Goals and Limitations of Modeling Collective Behavior in Biological Systems

Similar but Different: Dynamic Social Network Analysis Highlights Fundamental Differences between the Fission-Fusion Societies of Two Equid Species, the Onager and Grevy's Zebra

Sexually Differentiated Decision-Making Involves Faster Recruitment in the Early Stages for the Tibetan Antelopes Pantholops Hodgsonii

Hierarchy Establishment from Nonlinear Social Interactions and Metabolic Costs: an Application to Harpegnathos Saltator

Modelling group dynamic animal movement

Controlling noisy herds

Adaptive Network Dynamics and Evolution of Leadership in Collective Migration