Maladaptive defense mechanisms moderate treatment outcome in 6 months versus 12 months dialectical-behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder

Sebastian Euler,Anna Babl,Eliane Dommann,Esther Stalujanis,Cathy Labrish,Ueli Kramer,Shelley McMain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2334053
2024-04-24
Psychotherapy Research
Abstract:Objective We investigated whether defense mechanisms in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) predict treatment response of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and whether they moderate outcome in different treatment lengths.
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is whether the defense mechanisms of patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) can predict the treatment outcomes of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and whether these defense mechanisms play a moderating role in different treatment durations (6 months vs. 12 months). Specifically: 1. **Research Objective**: To explore whether the defense mechanisms at the beginning of treatment can predict the reduction of self-harm behavior during DBT treatment. 2. **Main Hypotheses**: - It is hypothesized that lower Overall Defensive Functioning (ODF) and higher levels of immature defense mechanisms are associated with smaller reductions in self-harm behavior, regardless of treatment duration. - It is predicted that the impact of defense mechanism scores on the reduction of self-harm behavior will differ across treatment durations. Specifically, in shorter (6 months) treatments, lower ODF and higher levels of immature defense mechanisms are associated with reductions in self-harm behavior, whereas this relationship does not hold in longer (12 months) treatments. Through this study, the authors hope to reveal the predictive and moderating roles of defense mechanisms in the effectiveness of DBT treatment, providing clues for further research.