Abstract:Background Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective in suppressing inflammation and preventing joint damage. But bDMARDs may be associated with increased risk of severe infection. Evidence on this is contradictory with some studies showing increased risk, whereas others reporting no significant changes. Objectives To determine the impact of the introduction of bDMARDs on severe infection among patients newly diagnosed with RA compared with non-RA individuals. Methods In this age- and gender-matched cohort study using administrative health data for the population of BC, Canada, all incident RA patients diagnosed between 1995–2007 were identified. Non-RA individuals were randomly selected from the general control population to match with RA. Incident RA/non-RA individuals were then divided into quarterly cohorts according to their diagnosis date. Two outcomes were examined: (1) first severe infection (FSI) after RA onset necessitating hospitalization or occurring during hospitalization; and (2) all severe infections (ASI) after RA onset. We calculated the 8-year FSI and ASI rate for each cohort. We conducted interrupted time-series analyses to compare levels and trends of FSI and ASI in RA and non-RA individuals diagnosed during pre-bDMARDs (1995–2001) and post-bDMARDs (2003–2007) periods. Adjusted 8-year FSI and ASI rates for RA and non-RA cohorts diagnosed five years after bDMARDs introduction were compared with expected rates assuming no bDMARDs introduction, based on extrapolation of pre-bDMARDs trends. Results A total of 60,226 and 588,499 incident RA/non-RA individuals were identified. We identified 8,954 FSI and 14,245 ASI in RA, and 56,153 FSI and 79,819 ASI in non-RA. The 8-year FSI rates among RA patients diagnosed in the pre-bDMARDs period decreased over time but leveled off among those diagnosed in the post-period (Figure 1). The adjusted difference between the post- and pre-bDMARDs secular trends of 8-year FSI rates was 0.68 (p=0.03) in RA and 0.03 (p=0.67) in non-RA (Table 1). The 8-year ASI rates among RA patients diagnosed in the pre-bDMARDs period decreased over time but increased significantly among those diagnosed in the post-period (Figure 1). The adjusted difference between the post- and pre-bDMARDs secular trends of 8-year ASI rates was 1.85 (p=0.001) in RA and 0.12 (p=0.29) in non-RA (Table 1). For RA cohort diagnosed 5 years after bDMARDs introduction, ASI rate increased by 20.4% than expected rates assuming no bDMARDs introduction. In contrast, ASI rate in non-RA increased by only 10.9%. Table 1. Results of interrupted time-series analysis of FSI/ASI rates, adjusting for age, gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Romano Charlson Comorbidity Index, diabetes, chronic kidney diseases, alcoholism, cancer, prior hospitalization with infection and socio-economic status at disease diagnosis year, using stepwise model selection Outcome Parameter RA Non-RA Unadj. Diff (95% CI) Adj. Diff (95% CI) Unadj. Diff (95% CI) Adj. Diff (95% CI) p-value p-value p-value p-value FSI Trend 0.63 (0.03, 1.22) 0.0441 0.68 (0.09, 1.27) 0.0292 0.08 (-0.08, 0.25) 0.3237 0.03 (-0.12, 0.19) 0.6728 Level (1 year post-intervention) 0.50 (-2.00, 2.99) 0.6989 0.31 (-1.88, 2.49) 0.7847 0.41 (-0.21, 1.03) 0.2041 0.26 (-0.24, 0.75) 0.3103 5 years post-intervention 3.01 (-0.85, 6.87) 0.1331 3.02 (-0.48, 6.52) 0.0986 0.75 (-0.24, 1.73) 0.1433 0.39 (-0.46, 1.25) 0.3721 ASI Trend 1.84 (0.83, 2.84) 0.0009 1.85 (0.81, 2.89) 0.0011 0.28 (0.04, 0.53) 0.0305 0.12 (-0.10, 0.34) 0.2877 Level (1 year post-intervention) -1.21 (-5.41, 3.00) 0.5763 -1.44 (-5.44, 2.56) 0.4850 1.46 (0.42, 2.49) 0.0085 1.20 (0.38, 2.02) 0.0064 5 years post-intervention 6.14 (0.26, 12.01) 0.0466 5.97 (0.02, 11.93) 0.0560 2.60 (1.08, 4.12) 0.0017 1.69 (0.45, 2.92) 0.0109 Figure 1. Unadjusted rates. Conclusion Arthritis onset after bDMARDs introduction is associated with an elevated risk of severe infection in RA patients, compared with matched non-RA individuals. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Ministry of Health of British Columbia and Population Data BC for providing access to the administrative data. All inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this publication are those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the Data Stewards or the [British Columbia] Ministry of Health. No personal identifying information was made available as part of this study. Procedures used were in compliance with British Columbia’s Freedom in Information and Privacy Protection Act. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia’s Behavioral Research Ethics Board (H15-00887). Disclosure of Interests None declared.

P122 Secular trends in prescription of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Experience from a UK regional centre (2016-2022)

AB1143 BURDEN OF GLUCOCORTICOIDS AMONG RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG MANAGEMENT

AB0192 COMPARABLE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS AFTER TRANSITION TO A BIOSIMILAR ANTI-TNF IN INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: POPULATION-BASED EVIDENCE FROM A POLICY CHANGE

Approaches to optimising access to NICE-approved biologic anti-TNFs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderately active disease

Biologic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Context of Biosimilars, Genetics, Epigenetics and COVID-19 Treatment

Real-World Drug Survival of Biologics and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Factors associated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiation for rheumatoid arthritis in underserved patient groups in England and Wales, UK: a national cohort study

Access to biologics and JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatic diseases in the biosimilars era in Poland: nation-level study

Trends in New Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Among Commercially Insured Children in the United States from 2001 to 2022

FRI0179 Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Therapy in US Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Table 1

Economic Burden and Treatment Patterns of Cycling Between Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs among Biologic-treated Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Reasons for multiple biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD switching and characteristics of treatment refractory rheumatoid arthritis

FRI0196 Real-World Impact of Taiwan Health Policy on Dose Tapering and Withdrawing Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review Study

Clinician and patient views on janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed methods study

P008 High response rate to Janus Kinase inhibitors after multiple biologic drug failures, across disease indications, in a District General Hospital: results from an audit of the prescribing, safety and efficacy of Janus Kinase inhibitor

Real-World Adherence and Drug Survival of Biologics among Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Current and Emerging DMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug selection in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics or JAK inhibitors without methotrexate: A retrospective hospital-based administrative claims database study

P243 Changes in the therapeutic management of inflammatory bowel disease in the biological era – a nationwide retrospective cohort study in three Nordic countries: Results from the TRINordic study

Risk of Severe Infections after the Introduction of Biologic DMARDs in People with Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Population-Based Interrupted Time-Series Analysis

Ten years with biologics: to whom do data on effectiveness and safety apply?