Abstract:Background and objective: One of the primary advantages of minimally invasive surgery is the shorter hospitalization time, which can potentially allow "outpatient" (OP) procedures. The recent advent of single-port (SP) robotics has further fueled the debate on this topic. We sought to provide an evidence-based analysis of the safety, feasibility, and advantages of robotic urological surgery in the OP setting. Methods: A literature search in PubMed was conducted in June 2024 to identify studies on the feasibility and safety of OP robotic urological surgery. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria and the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome model were used to select retrospective and prospective studies. Data collected included patient characteristics, operative outcomes, same-day discharge (SDD), and complication and readmission rates. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data analysis and synthesis were performed using Review Manager and GraphPad Prism. Key findings and limitations: For 3291 patients in noncomparative studies, we found SDD rates of 46.17% for multiport (MP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), 77.35% for SP-RARP, 93.1% for robot-assisted radical or partial nephrectomy, and 93.3% for adrenalectomy. Among comparative studies involving 4130 patients, we found that the OP setting is feasible and safe. Comparison of overall complications between OP and inpatients (IP) settings revealed a relative risk (RR) of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.91; p = 0.01) favoring OP. The risk of readmission was lower risk for OP than for IP surgery (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.85; p = 0.008). Comparison of MP-RARP and SP-RARP revealed that OP protocols are more easily achievable with SP-RARP (44.20% vs 79.59%; p < 0.001). Conclusions and clinical implications: OP robotic urological surgery is feasible and safe in selected patients and can enhance satisfaction and reduce costs. SP robotics could promote wider adoption of SDD protocols. Strict case selection minimizes complications. Differences in health care systems should be considered in future evaluations. Patient summary: We examined the feasibility and safety of same-day hospital discharge after robot-assisted surgery for urology operations. We found that this option can be safely offered and may be even more viable if the use of robots allowing surgery through a single keyhole incision becomes more widespread.

Omission of intraoperative drain placement during robotic partial nephrectomy and robotic radical prostatectomy is safe: an analysis of 18,000 patients

Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

To drain or not to drain in uro-oncological robotic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Current Technique and Outcomes

Safety of Selective Operative Drainage After Pancreatic Resection

Comparison of peri- and intraoperative outcomes of open vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Outpatient Robotic Urological Surgery: An Evidence-based Analysis

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review

Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis or postoperative complications

Robotic versus open mini-incision living donor nephrectomy: Single centre experience

Robotic partial nephrectomy is associated with a significantly decreased rate of postoperative pseudoaneurysm compared to open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Comparison of incidence of acute kidney injury after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with that after open retropubic and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies in patients with prostate cancer

Robotic living donor nephrectomy is associated with reduced post-operative opioid use compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic approach

Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Risk Surgical Candidates

Role of pelvic drain and timing of urethral catheter removal following RARP: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Perioperative Complications of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Analysis of 886 Patients at 5 United States Centers

Perioperative and Complication-Related Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Comparative NSQIP Analysis

Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes - Is Laparoscopy Still Justified?