Abstract:Timely and accurate assessment of battlefield strikes can improve the utilization of firepower resources and achieve optimal combat effectiveness. However, due to the complexity and uncertainty of the environment in actual war, it is difficult to obtain accurate target damage information, which can be expressed as uncertain, incomplete, or fuzzy decision information in mathematics. In this paper, the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis method is used to evaluate the damage level of the target under an uncertain environment. We establish a set of characteristic indicators for the target damage effect and use the tracking results of maneuvering targets to determine the degree of target damage. Aiming at the uncertainty of the target data, the upper and lower limit dataset of uncertainty is established, and the membership function of the damage characteristic index is given. Combined with the probability density function, the comprehensive membership function of the damage effect is given, the acceptability index of each damage grade is compared, and the damage effect evaluation with uncertain weight information is given. Based on target vulnerability characteristics and combined with multiple damage elements, a target damage assessment model with multiple damage parameters is established, and the damage results are fitted. We study the relationship between target damage efficiency and various damage parameters. For the optimization strike problem of maximum damage to targets with multiple random incomplete information, a maximum damage optimization model is established using the objective function of maximizing damage probability and the missile firepower coverage area as constraint conditions. Experimental results show that the algorithm used in this paper can effectively solve the damage assessment problem under the condition of random incomplete information.
materials science, multidisciplinary,physics, applied,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and optimize target damage under the condition of random and incomplete information. Specifically, the complexity and uncertainty of the battlefield environment make it difficult to obtain accurate target damage information, which may be presented as uncertain, incomplete or fuzzy decision - making information. Therefore, the main objectives of the paper are:
1. **Establish a target damage assessment model**: Use the Stochastic Multi - criteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA) method to assess the damage level of the target in an uncertain environment. The paper establishes a series of characteristic indicators of target damage effects and combines the tracking results of mobile targets to determine the degree of target damage.
2. **Handle the uncertainty of target data**: In view of the uncertainty of target data, establish the upper and lower limit data sets of uncertainty, and give the membership function of damage characteristic indicators. Combined with the probability density function, the comprehensive membership function of damage effects is given, the acceptability indices of each damage level are compared, and the damage effect assessment with uncertain weight information is provided.
3. **Establish a maximum damage optimization model**: For the problem of achieving maximum damage optimization of the target under multiple random and incomplete information conditions, the paper establishes a maximum damage optimization model with the objective function of maximizing the damage probability and the constraint condition of the missile fire coverage area.
4. **Experimental verification**: Through the experimental results, it is verified that the proposed algorithm can effectively solve the damage assessment problem under the condition of random and incomplete information.
### Formula summary
- **Membership function**:
- No damage \( g_1(\eta_i) \):
\[
g_1(\eta_i)=\begin{cases}
\frac{T_{\max,i1}-\eta_i}{T_{\max,i1}-T_{\min,i1}}, & T_{\min,i1}\leq\eta_i\leq T_{\max,i1}\\
0, & \eta_i > T_{\max,i1}
\end{cases}
\]
- Moderate damage \( g_2(\eta_i) \):
\[
g_2(\eta_i)=\begin{cases}
\frac{\eta_i - T_{\min,i2}}{(T_{\max,i2}-T_{\min,i2})/2}, & T_{\min,i2}\leq\eta_i\leq\frac{T_{\min,i2}+T_{\max,i2}}{2}\\
\frac{T_{\max,i2}-\eta_i}{(T_{\max,i2}-T_{\min,i2})/2}, & \frac{T_{\min,i2}+T_{\max,i2}}{2}\leq\eta_i\leq T_{\max,i2}\\
0, & \eta_i > T_{\max,i2}\lor\eta_i < T_{\min,i2}
\end{cases}
\]
- Completely destroyed \( g_3(\eta_i) \):
\[
g_3(\eta_i)=\begin{cases}
0, & \eta_i < T_{\min,i3}\\
\frac{\eta_i - T_{\min,i3}}{T_0 - T_{\min,i3}}, & T_{\min,i3}\leq\eta_i\leq T_0\\
1, & \eta_i > T_0
\end{cases}
\]
- **Comprehensive membership function**:
\[
H_j(\tilde{\eta})=\sum_{i = 1}^3\omega_i g_j(\eta_i)
\]
- **Acceptability index**:
\[
h_j = E\left\{\fr