Exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education for Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Jesper B. Larsen,Søren T. Skou,Mogens Laursen,Niels Henrik Bruun,Lars Arendt-Nielsen,Pascal Madeleine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12179

2024-05-25

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Importance Up to 20% of patients develop chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet there is a scarcity of effective interventions for this population. Objective To evaluate whether neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education were superior to pain neuroscience education alone for patients with chronic pain after TKA. Design, Setting, and Participants A superiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 outpatient clinics at Aalborg University Hospital in Denmark. Participants with moderate-to-severe average daily pain intensity and no signs of prosthesis failure at least 1 year after primary TKA were included. Participant recruitment was initiated on April 12, 2019, and completed on October 31, 2022. The 12-month follow-up was completed on March 21, 2023. Interventions The study included 24 sessions of supervised neuromuscular exercise (2 sessions per week for 12 weeks) and 2 total sessions of pain neuroscience education (6 weeks between each session) or the same pain neuroscience education sessions alone. The interventions were delivered in groups of 2 to 4 participants. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 months using the mean score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, covering the 4 subscales pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS 4 ; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes). The outcome assessors and statistician were blinded. All randomized participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Results Among the 69 participants (median age, 67.2 years [IQR, 61.2-71.9 years]; 40 female [58%]) included in the study, 36 were randomly assigned to the neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education group, and 33 to the pain neuroscience education–alone group. The intention-to-treat analysis showed no between-group difference in change from baseline to 12 months for the KOOS 4 (7.46 [95% CI, 3.04-11.89] vs 8.65 [95% CI, 4.67-12.63] points; mean difference, −1.33 [95% CI, −7.59 to 4.92]; P = .68). Among the 46 participants who participated in the 12-month assessment in the 2 groups, 16 (34.8%) experienced a clinically important improvement (a difference of ≥10 points on the KOOS 4 ) with no between-group difference. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, the results demonstrated that neuromuscular exercises and pain neuroscience education were not superior to pain neuroscience education alone in participants with chronic pain after TKA. Approximately one-third of the participants, regardless of intervention, experienced clinically important improvements. Future studies should investigate which patient characteristics indicate a favorable response to exercises and/or pain neuroscience education. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03886259

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The aim of this paper is to address the issue of evaluating the efficacy of neuromuscular exercise combined with pain neuroscience education (PNE) compared to pain neuroscience education alone for patients with chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Specifically, the primary objective of the study is to assess whether a 12-week intervention program that includes neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education is more effective than pain neuroscience education alone in improving chronic pain and functional status in patients after total knee arthroplasty. The study hypothesizes that participants receiving neuromuscular exercise combined with pain neuroscience education will show significantly greater improvements in pain and function from baseline to 12 months.

The primary outcome measure of the study is the change in the mean score of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), which includes four subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and knee-related quality of life. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. The predefined minimal clinically important difference is 10 points.

The study results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome measure, the mean KOOS score, between the neuromuscular exercise combined with pain neuroscience education and pain neuroscience education alone. However, approximately one-third of the participants experienced clinically important improvements regardless of the intervention received. This suggests that although the combined treatment was not superior to pain neuroscience education alone, both interventions were able to facilitate improvements in pain and function for a subset of patients.