Diagnostic and prognostic value of MR-pro ADM, procalcitonin, and copeptin in sepsis

Basar Cander,Emin Fatih Visneci,Osman Karaoglan,Fatma Cakmak,Alpay Tuncar,Bahadir Taslidere
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2023-0865
2024-01-12
Open Medicine
Abstract:Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. There is a need for biomarkers that can be used for the diagnosis of sepsis and the early identification of patients at high risk of death. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), procalcitonin (PCT), and copeptin in sepsis. A total of 28 sepsis, 32 septic shock, and 30 control patients were included in our prospective study. Patients' MR-proADM, PCT, and copeptin levels were recorded. Sequential organ failure assessment scores, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality were also recorded. These values were compared between the sepsis, septic shock, and control groups. The mean age of all participants was 64.04 ± 15.83 years. In the study, 37 (61.6%) patients were female and 23 (39.3%) were male. There was no statistically significant difference in gender/age between all patient groups and the control group (for all, p > 0.05). We found a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors in terms of MR-proADM, PCT, and copeptin levels. There was a significant difference between the sepsis and septic shock groups in terms of MR-proADM and PCT. A significant correlation was found between the length of hospital stay and MR-proADM and copeptin. MR-proADM, PCT, and copeptin may be useful in the prognosis of sepsis and to predict the length of stay in hospital and mortality.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the diagnostic and prognostic values of mid - regional pro - adrenomedullin (MR - proADM), procalcitonin (PCT) and C - terminal peptide of provasopressin (copeptin) in sepsis. Specifically, researchers hope to evaluate their ability to distinguish sepsis patients from healthy control groups and their roles in predicting patients' hospital stay, 30 - day mortality, etc. by analyzing the levels of these biomarkers. ### Research Background Sepsis is a life - threatening organ dysfunction caused by the host's dysregulated response to infection. Due to the lack of specificity in traditional clinical symptoms and laboratory test results, it is necessary to find biomarkers that can be used for the early diagnosis of sepsis and the identification of high - risk patients. MR - proADM, PCT and copeptin are potential biomarkers that have been widely studied in recent years. ### Research Objectives 1. **Diagnostic Value**: Evaluate the diagnostic value of MR - proADM, PCT and copeptin in distinguishing sepsis patients from healthy control groups. 2. **Prognostic Value**: Explore the prognostic value of these biomarkers in predicting the hospital stay and 30 - day mortality of sepsis patients. ### Main Findings - **MR - proADM**: Significantly higher in sepsis and septic shock patients than in the control group, and there are significant differences between survivors and non - survivors. The level of MR - proADM is positively correlated with the length of hospital stay. - **PCT**: Significantly higher in sepsis and septic shock patients than in the control group, but the difference between sepsis and septic shock patients is not significant. There are significant differences between survivors and non - survivors in PCT levels. - **Copeptin**: The differences among sepsis, septic shock and the control group are not significant, but there are significant differences between survivors and non - survivors. The level of copeptin is positively correlated with the length of hospital stay. ### Conclusion MR - proADM, PCT and copeptin have certain values in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of sepsis, especially for predicting patients' hospital stay and 30 - day mortality. However, due to the complexity of sepsis, a single biomarker may not be sufficient to comprehensively assess the condition. It is recommended to combine multiple biomarkers for comprehensive judgment.