A novel multi-objective spiral optimization algorithm for an innovative solar/biomass-based multi-generation energy system: 3E analyses, and optimization algorithms comparison
Yan Cao,Hima Nikafshan Rad,Danial Hamedi Jamali,Nasim Hashemian,Amir Ghasemi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112961
IF: 10.4
2020-09-01
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:<p>A novel multi-generation energy system is proposed consisting of a solar gas turbine system, multi-effect seawater desalination, LNG cold energy recovery unit, and a double effect absorption chiller. In addition, different working fluids of the ORC system are examined to select the suitable working fluid in terms of global warming potential and exergy efficiency of the system. Subsequently, energy, exergy, and economic (3E) analyses are performed to comprehensively evaluate the energy system. Besides, a parametric study is conducted to assess the effect of the most influential decision variables on the proposed system. Afterward, the novel multi-objective spiral optimization (MOSPO) algorithm is introduced to minimize total cost rate of the system while maximizing the exergy efficiency as the conflicting objective functions. The proposed algorithm is developed to optimize the decision variables effectively. To ascertain the final optimum solution point, three conventional methods i.e. TOPSIS, LINMAP and Shannon's entropy are implemented. The results revealed that exergy efficiency and total cost rate of the system at the baseline are 60.05%, and 36.75 $/h, respectively. Furthermore, the net power output of the system would be 106.5 kW in addition to 0.7703 kW heating load, 56.01 kW cooling capacity, and 35.74 kg/h fresh water production capacity. The eco-environmental assessment revealed the fact that the proposed renewable-based energy system is capable of avoiding 485 tons CO<sub>2</sub> emissions annually, and product cost rate reduction up to 6 $/hr in comparison to coal and natural gas-based energy systems. Besides, the proposed MOSPO algorithm is compared with common optimization methods; accordingly, the conventional algorithms are selected for the comparison including non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), the multiple objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm, the Pareto envelope-based selection algorithm II (PESA-II), and the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm II (SPEA-II). The comparison results show that the proposed MOSPO algorithm is preferable according to the Taylor Diagrams showing the performance of the algorithms.</p>
energy & fuels,thermodynamics,mechanics