Abstract:This study investigates the effectiveness of panel discussions, a specific interactive teaching technique where a group of students leads a pre-planned, topic-focused discussion with audience participation, in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses for international medical students. This approach aims to simulate professional conference discussions, preparing students for future academic and clinical environments where such skills are crucial. While traditional group presentations foster critical thinking and communication, a gap exists in understanding how medical students perceive the complexities of preparing for and participating in panel discussions within an ESP setting. This qualitative study investigates the perceived advantages and disadvantages of these discussions from the perspectives of both panelists (medical students) and the audience (peers). Additionally, the study explores potential improvements based on insights from ESP instructors. Utilizing a two-phase design involving reflection papers and focus group discussions, data were collected from 46 medical students and three ESP instructors. Thematic analysis revealed that panel discussions offer unique benefits compared to traditional presentations, including enhanced engagement and more dynamic skill development for both panelists and the audience. Panelists reported gains in personal and professional development, including honing critical thinking, communication, and presentation skills. The audience perceived these discussions as engaging learning experiences that fostered critical analysis and information synthesis. However, challenges such as academic workload and concerns about discussion quality were also identified. The study concludes that panel discussions, when implemented effectively, can be a valuable tool for enhancing critical thinking, communication skills, and subject matter knowledge in ESP courses for medical students. These skills are transferable and can benefit students in various academic and professional settings, including future participation in medical conferences. This research provides valuable insights for ESP instructors seeking to integrate panel discussions into their curriculum, ultimately improving student learning outcomes and preparing them for future success in professional communication.

"How to article:" guidelines for serving on an expert panel

Evaluating panel discussions in ESP classes: an exploration of international medical students' and ESP instructors' perspectives through qualitative research

How to give an effective conference presentation

An Approach to Diversifying the Selection of a Guideline Panel—The Process Utilized for the Updated Adult Critical Care Ultrasound Guidelines

Promoting business and entrepreneurial awareness in health care professionals: lessons from venture capital panels at medicine 2.0 conferences

How to make the medical consultation more successful from a patient's perspective? Tips for doctors and patients from lay people in the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands

Put Yourself out There! A Strategy for Effective Self-Promotion in Academic Medicine

Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development

The MedEdPORTAL Infinity Mirror: Conducting an Interactive Workshop on How to Develop an Educational Summary Report for MedEdPORTAL

Expert Witness Participation in Civil and Criminal Proceedings

CAEP 2016 Academic Symposium: A Writer's Guide to Key Steps in Producing Quality Medical Education Scholarship

Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review

Patients as experts in the illness experience: Implications for the ethics of patient involvement in health professions education

Educating for adaptive expertise: case examples along the medical education continuum

Sensory Panel Performance Evaluation—Comprehensive Review of Practical Approaches

Narratives of Actionable Medical Leadership From Senior Leaders for Aspiring Leaders in Academic Medicine

How to read an ethics paper

Serving on Organizational Boards: What Nurses Need to Know

Determining presentation skills gaps among healthcare professionals

Becoming an Expert by Experience: Benefits and Challenges of Educating Mental Health Nursing Students

How to be successful in an academic interview in pediatric oncology: A survey of Children's Oncology Group (COG) and International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) mentors