Abstract:Objective]Rice leaf is not only a vital site for photosynthesis, but also an important factor for ideal plant architecture in rice. This study is useful in map-based cloning of target gene and marker-assisted transferring rolled gene in rice breeding programs.[Method]A mutantrl16(t)(rolled leaf 16) with rolled leaves was derived from theIndica type rice 9311(wild -type WT) via the radiation of60Co-γ. Then, it was planted for several generations to test the stability of mutant phenotype in the field. At heading stage, rl16(t) and WT were randomly selected 10 strains to measure the main agronomic traits including leaf rolling index, respectively.The same part of leaf of rl16(t) and WT was taken and fixed by FAA, then dehydrated in series ethanol and paraffin embedding. After that, the fixed leaf was incised to 10 microns slices and these slices were stained by sarranine. Finally, the bulliform cells were observed, the number of them was counted and their area was measured under the microscope. Chlorophyll content ofrl16(t) and WT were tested at tilling stage. In addition, the leaf phenotype of the F1 plants and F2 population were investigated, and the mode of rolled gene inheritance was analyzed by chi-square test. To fine-map theRl16(t), an F2population was generated by crossing between therl16(t)mutant and aJaponica type rice Dianjingyou. Target gene was limited by simple sequence repeat (SSR) and InDel markers. Three known domain structure genes in the mapped region were analyzed by gene quantitative expression.[Result]Compared with wild-type, the mutant had not only typically adaxially rolled leaves, but also decreased height and panicle length, as well as the seed setting percentage. The whole plant ofrl16(t)appeared leaf longitudinally rolled into the approximate tubular phenotype at seedling stage (three leaves and one new), then kept it at the rest of time. On the contrary, WT had flat leaves in the entire life. Paraffin section of flag leaf indicated that the number and area of bulliform cell ofrl16(t) were lower than that of WT. The number of bulliform cell in WT was (385.1±43.6) cells/mm2, while that in therl16(t)was(1059.5±254.4) cells/mm2. However, for the bulliform cell, there were no significant and obvious changes ofrl16(t)and WT. The carotenoid content ofrl16(t)was lower than that of WT, but the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content were significantly higher than that of WT. All of the F1 hybrid betweenrl16(t) and WT indicated flat leaves, meanwhile, in an F2 population, rolled and flat leaf plants segregated in a 3﹕1 ratio (97 rolled versus 326 flat leaves, chi-square = 0.86<chi-square 0.05 = 3.84). Cytological analysis indicated that the rolled leaf phenotype might be caused by the change of number and size of bulliform cells. Genetic analysis indicated that the rolled leaf characters were controlled by a recessive nuclear gene. Using SSR markers,Rl16(t) was initially mapped in the region between the RM23769 and RM23916 on the long arm of chromosome 9. Furthermore, with enlarged population and more developed InDel markers,Rl16(t) was finally delimited to a 51 kb region governed by the InDel marker DF70 and SSR marker RM23818. Three known structure coding genes (LOC_Os09g09320, LOC_Os09g09360, LOC_Os09g09370) were predicted in the limited interval. The expression of LOC_Os09g09320 and LOC_Os09g09370 inrl16(t) showed no obvious differences with that of WT, but the expression of LOC_Os09g09360 inrl16(t)was only the half of WT.As for quantitative expression analysis of the eight genes that contributed to the rolled leaf, seven of them (SLL1, ROC5, RL14, SRL1, ACL1, NRL1, NAL7)had a decline in therl16(t) mutant, while OSZHD1appeared a rise.[Conclusion]The rolled leaf of rl16(t)was due to reduced number and area of bulliform cells. In addition, thisgene would be a putative novel rolled leaf gene. As the result of quantitative gene expression, LOC_Os09g09360 may be the target genes.

Leaf width gene LW5/D1 affects plant architecture and yield in rice by regulating nitrogen utilization efficiency

An Evolutionarily Conserved Gene, Fuwa, Plays A Role in Determining Panicle Architecture, Grain Shape and Grain Weight in Rice

GW5-Like, a homolog of GW5, negatively regulates grain width, weight and salt resistance in rice.

Overexpression of OsZHD1, a Zinc Finger Homeodomain Class Homeobox Transcription Factor, Induces Abaxially Curled and Drooping Leaf in Rice

SLGcontrols Grain Size and Leaf Angle by Modulating Brassinosteroid Homeostasis in Rice

Genetic dissection of top three leaf traits in rice using progenies from one japonica×indica cross.

Physiological Characters and Gene Mapping of a Dwarf and Wide-Leaf Mutant Osdwl1 in Rice (oryza Sativa L.)

Identification and Characterization of NARROW AND ROLLED LEAF 1, a Novel Gene Regulating Leaf Morphology and Plant Architecture in Rice

Fine mapping and characterization of a novel dwarf and narrow-leaf mutant dnl1 in rice

Genetic Analysis and Fine Mapping of a Novel Rolled Leaf Gene in Rice

Morphological and Physiological Analysis of Narrow and Striped Leaf 1(nsl1) Mutant of Rice(oryza Sativa L.) and the Gene Mapping

Mutation of the Rice Narrow Leaf1 Gene, Which Encodes a Novel Protein, Affects Vein Patterning and Polar Auxin Transport.

The APC/CTAD1-WIDE LEAF 1-NARROW LEAF 1 Pathway Controls Leaf Width in Rice.

Control of Leaf Width by the APC/C<sup>TAD1</sup>-WL1-NAL1 Pathway in Rice

DLT/OsGRAS-32, Regulating Leaf Width and Thickness by Controlling Cell Number in Oryza Sativa

Control of Leaf Width by the APC/CTAD1-WL1-NAL1 Pathway in Rice

Variation in WIDTH OF LEAF AND GRAIN Contributes to Grain and Leaf Size by Controlling LARGE2 Stability in Rice

Fine Mapping of LOW TILLER 1 , a Gene Controlling Tillering and Panicle Branching in Rice

[Heredity and fine mapping of a yellow leaf and less tillering mutant yllt10 in rice]

Genetic Analysis and Identification of Candidate Genes for a Narrow Leaf Mutant (zy17) in Rice

<i>LEAF TIP RUMPLED 1</i> Regulates Leaf Morphology and Salt Tolerance in Rice