Abstract:Background: Climate change, largely triggered by human-induced greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, seems unstoppable. There was a strong rebound of anthropogenic emissions of CO 2, the preponderant GHG in terms of contribution to global warming, around the world after the COVID-19 lockdown. Also, there is still no widely accepted international treaty on curbing the anthropogenic emissions of CH 4 and N 2O, the second and third predominant GHG, respectively, so far. Thereby, prima facie, in respect to mitigating climate change, currently, humans have no aces up their sleeves. It seems that current temperature rise is not high enough to take alarm until the occurrence of tipping point. Policy: Climate-related international treaties, such as 2016 Paris agreement, are compromises among conflicting geopolitical pressures. However, currently, the climate treaties show little mandatory binding force on the signatories who are able to violate and then get off scot-free, thus may end up like a nostrum. Throughout the European history, I find that the only way, if at all, to achieve the peace or obedience of a treaty is via balancing powers, embodied in Bismarck's Realpolitik of Germany and Richelieu's Raison d'état of France. Similarly, the Chinese history in East Asia proved the significance of unadulterated ideological neutrality and Darwinian adaptability in the kaleidoscope of evolving circumstances in maintaining order and enforcement of international treaties through balancing the power of rivalries to constrain ever-recurring challengers for equilibrium. Recommendations: A successful policy needs to make a thorough analysis of all relevant factors to form a long-term strategic notion. Then, statesmen need to distill an array of nebulous, always contradictory options into a tenacious, controllable direction. Thereby, I suggest that, for better curbing global warming, climate agreements or climate club be incorporated into an overall geopolitical framework among the international communities.

European ruling linking climate change to human rights could be a game changer — here's how

Vanuatu Leads Drive to Secure an Opinion from the International Court of Justice on State Responsibilities to Turn Words into Action on Climate Change

The climate crisis is solvable, but human rights must trump profits

Climate Litigation, Extraterritoriality of Human Rights and the German Constitution

The Role of Cities in Shaping Transnational Law in Climate Governance

Climate Change Mitigation through Civil Procedure? Justiciability in Two Nordic Climate Cases

Climate Law: Path Paved for Civil Action

Child and Youth-Friendly Justice for the Climate Crisis: Relying on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

Mathur v. Ontario

Climate change on the board: navigating directors' duties

THE SOURCES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

Bringing health out of the clinic and into the courts

The power of human rights tribunals: Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change

Climate Change Litigation: Chronicles from the Global South. A Comparative Study

Challenging exclusion: bringing the human rights to water and sanitation to Europe

The potential of litigating children's rights in the climate crisis before the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child

Quasi-constitutional court of human rights for Europe? Comments on Geir Ulfstein

The Climate Change Litigation Based Human Rights Approach in Corporations: Prospects and Challenges

Climate politics in global Hobbesian Jungle

Rights-Based Climate Litigation in Brazil: An Assessment of Constitutional Cases Before the Brazilian Supreme Court

The Swiss Human Rights Due Diligence Legislation: Between Law and Politics