Interlaboratory comparison of methods to determine the stable isotope composition of soil water

Glen R. Walker,Peter H. Woods,Graham B. Allison
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90096-5
IF: 3.9
1994-01-01
Chemical Geology
Abstract:This paper presents results of an interlaboratory comparison of the effects of different techniques for extracting soil water on its measured 2H and 18O composition. In the comparison, four soils (a sand, a gypseous sand, and a clay soil at high and low water contents) were prepared and distributed to fourteen laboratories. Water was then extracted from these samples and analysed using each laboratory's standard method. A number of verification procedures was used to ensure that the experiment was truly a comparison of extraction techniques and that reported variations were not due to sample preparation, transport or measurement. The extraction techniques used included azeotropic, vacuum and microdistillation methods. The results show a large variation between laboratories in the isotopic composition of the water extracted (of up to 30‰ for 2H and 3.4‰ for 18O). The variation increased as the water content of the soil decreased and was greater for clays than sand at comparable soil matric suctions. The δ-value obtained was correlated with the final extraction temperature, with incomplete extraction being the most likely cause for the variation. The study highlights the need to develop standard protocols for the extraction of water from soils for isotopic analysis.
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?