Abstract:Objectives: Various methods have been used to classify class III asymmetry. There is little information on the use of an asymmetry index to examine soft tissue changes and outcomes for patients with class III asymmetry. This study aimed to (1) evaluate soft tissue changes and outcomes for three types of mandibular asymmetry and (2) determine if measures are associated with type of asymmetry. Materials and methods: Adults who consecutively underwent bimaxillary surgery using surgery-first approach for correction of class III asymmetry were divided into three groups based on type of mandibular asymmetry. This previously reported classification system is simple and mutually independent, categorizing mandibular asymmetry according to the amount and direction of ramus asymmetry relative to menton deviation: patients with a larger transverse ramus distance on the menton deviation side were divided into group 1 and group 2; group 1 (n = 45) exhibited a menton deviation larger than ramus discrepancy; group 2 (n = 11) exhibited a menton deviation less than ramus discrepancy; group 3 (n = 22) had larger transverse ramus distance contralateral to the side of the menton deviation. Soft tissue facial asymmetry indices, calculated from cone beam computed tomography images, assessed midline and contour asymmetry presurgery, changes postsurgery, and outcomes. Results: Compared with groups 1 and 2, the presurgery index for contour and midline asymmetry was smallest for group 3. All the three groups had significant improvement in midline asymmetry postsurgery, and outcome measures were good; there were no differences between groups. However, contour asymmetry only improved significantly for groups 1 and 2. The outcome for contour asymmetry was fair for groups 1 and 3 and poor for group 2. Conclusions: Bimaxillary surgery significantly improved facial midline asymmetry. The type of mandibular asymmetry was associated with postsurgical changes and outcomes for contour asymmetry. Clinical relevance: Understanding the types of mandibular asymmetry could help clinicians to develop treatment plans and predict treatment changes and outcomes.

Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry

Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?

Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes

Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study

Surgical correction of the midface in craniofacial microsomia. Part 1: A systematic review

3D-CT measurements of facial symmetry in severe CFM patients: A comparative study between mandibular ascending ramus distraction osteogenesis and bone grafting

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis Of Female Skeletal Class Iii Facial Asymmetry With And Without Maxillary Occlusal Cant

Characteristics of Midface Asymmetry in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Three-Dimensional Analysis

Type of mandibular asymmetry affects changes and outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry

Three-Dimensional Dynamic Analysis of the Facial Movement Symmetry of Skeletal Class III Patients with Facial Asymmetry.

An Objective, Quantitative, Dynamic Assessment of Facial Movement Symmetry Changes after Orthognathic Surgery

Comprehensive Treatment Approach for Hemifacial Microsomia: Integrating Orthognathic Surgery with Sequential Customized Implantation

Relationship between Bilateral Landmarks of Facial Asymmetry in Skeletal Class II and Class III in Vertical Dimension: 3D Facial Scan and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Skeletal characteristics of facial asymmetry in adolescence submental vertex and postero-anterior radiographs analyses

Surgical-orthodontic Treatment of Class III Patients with Long Face Problems: a Retrospective Study.

Orthognathic Considerations of Maxillary and Mandibular Asymmetry at Skeletal Maturity in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

Assessment of Masseter Volume and Postoperative Stability After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Facial Asymmetry

Three-dimensional Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue after Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Skeletal Class III and Asymmetry

Orthodontic and Surgical Management of a Patient with Severe Skeletal Class II Deformity and Facial Asymmetry: A Case Report with a 5-Year Follow-Up.

Facial asymmetry of the hard and soft tissues in skeletal Class I, II, and III patients

Classification and characterization of facial asymmetry in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cluster analysis