Differences in Diagnostic Sensitivity of Cultures Between Sample Types in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shintaro Watanabe,Emi Kamono,Hyonmin Choe,Hiroyuki Ike,Yutaka Inaba,Naomi Kobayashi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.016
IF: 4.435
2024-03-15
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:Background Differences between the bacterial culture results of the preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid of implants in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are important issues in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify the differences in pooled diagnostic accuracy between culture sample types for diagnosing PJI by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Data extraction and study assessment using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies were performed independently by two reviewers. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve, and area under the sROC curve (AUC) were estimated for each sample type. Results There were thirty-two studies that were included in the analysis after screening and eligibility assessment. Above goes into Methods Section The pooled sensitivities of preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.70), 0.71 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.85), while the specificities were 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.98), 0.92 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.96), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95), respectively. The AUCs for preoperative fluid, intraoperative tissue, and sonication fluid were 0.86, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. Conclusion Sonication fluid culture demonstrated better sensitivity compared with the conventional culture method, and preoperative fluid culture provided lower sensitivity in diagnosing PJI.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?