Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>The durability of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) remains their greatest disadvantage, given that fixed tissue leaflets are not immune to structural degeneration from calcification and thrombosis. Therefore, a second intervention is necessary, especially given that TAV in low-risk patients has shown noninferior outcomes compared with surgery. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic and turbulent properties of the flow downstream with different TAV-in-TAV configurations, to offer basic hemodynamic guidance for future interventions when currently implanted valves structurally degrade.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Six TAV-in-TAV configurations were chosen: 23 mm Evolut-in-26 mm Evolut, 23 mm Evolut-in-23 mm SAPIEN 3, 26 mm Evolut-in-26 mm Evolut, 26 mm Evolut-in-23 mm SAPIEN 3, 23 mm SAPIEN3-in-26 mm Evolut, and 23 mm SAPIEN3-in-23 mm SAPIEN 3. Their hemodynamic performance was assessed in a pulse duplicator for 100 cycles. High-speed imaging and particle image velocimetry were performed to assess turbulence. Effective orifice area (EOA), pinwheeling index (PI), and Reynolds shear stress (RSS) were evaluated.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The largest mean EOA was obtained with 23 mm SAPIEN-in-26 mm Evolut (2.07 ± 0.06 cm<sup>2</sup>), and the smallest was obtained with 23 mm Evolut-in-23 mm SAPIEN (1.50 ± 0.04 cm<sup>2</sup>) (<em>P</em> < .001). The highest mean PI was obtained with SAPIEN-in-SAPIEN (26.5 ± 2.00%), and the lowest was obtained with 26 mm Evolut-in-26 mm Evolut (7.5 ± 1.6%) (<em>P</em> < .01). At peak systole, the least detrimental RSS range was obtained with 23 mm Evolut-in-26 mm Evolut (up to ∼340 Pa), and the most detrimental RSS range was obtained with 23 mm Evolut-in-SAPIEN (∼900 Pa) (<em>P</em> < .01).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>This study shows that best hemodynamic parameters are TAV-specific (implanted and to be implanted). In addition, it shows that RSS levels, which are indicative of turbulence levels and associated with blood damage, are 2- to 3-fold higher after TAV-in-TAV.</p>

The hemodynamics of transcatheter aortic valves in transcatheter aortic valves

An in vitro evaluation of turbulence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Characterization of Turbulent Flow Behind a Transcatheter Aortic Valve in Different Implantation Positions

Reducing Long‐Term Mortality Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Requires Systemic Differentiation of Patient‐Specific Coronary Hemodynamics

Deformation in Transcatheter heart valves: Clinical implications and considerations

10-Year Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Leaflet Design (Intra- Versus Supra-Annular) in Mortality and Hemodynamic Performance

Navigating the “Optimal Implantation Depth” With a Self-Expandable TAVR Device in Daily Clinical Practice

Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis

[In Vitro Experimental Study on Hemodynamics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement]

Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Comparison of Two Generations of Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves in Nine Surgical Valves: An In Vitro Study

An Analysis Regarding the Article: Insight Into the Optimal Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Engineering perspective on transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus: Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Study

Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Hemodynamic effect of supra-annular implantation of SAPIEN 3 balloon expandable valve

800.14 Differences in Hemodynamic Performance and Modality Measurements Between Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expanding Valves in ViV-TAVI Patients with Failed Aortic Bioprosthesis (FAB-TAVI Study)

Hydrodynamic Assessment of Explanted Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valves: Novel Insights Into Noncalcific and Calcific Mechanisms

Unique technical challenges in patients undergoing TAVR for failed aortic homografts

Comparison of SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve stent-frame expansion: evaluation using multi-slice computed tomography

Comparison of two self-expanding transcatheter heart valves for degenerated surgical bioprostheses: the AVENGER multicentre registry