The mechanisms underlying conditioning of phantom percepts differ between those with hallucinations and synesthesia

Magdalena del Rio,Eren Kafadar,Victoria Fisher,Rhys D’Costa,Albert Powers,Jamie Ward,Rhys D'Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53663-3
IF: 4.6
2024-03-09
Scientific Reports
Abstract:There are many different kinds of 'phantom' percepts but it is unknown whether they are united by common mechanisms. For example, synaesthesia (e.g., numbers evoking colour) and hallucinations appear conceptually and phenomenologically similar: both result in a percept that does not have an environmental correlate. Here, people with synaesthesia (n = 66) performed a conditioned hallucinations paradigm known to be sensitive to hallucination susceptibility, and we asked whether synaesthetes would show the same behavioural profile as hallucinators in this task. Repeated pairing of checkerboards with tones, and gratings with colours encourages the participant to draw on prior knowledge when asked to report on the presence of the difficult-to-detect target stimulus. Synaesthetes show increased modelled expectancies for the stimulus association across the board, resulting in a higher number of detections at all stimulus intensities. This is in contrast to the pattern observed in hallucinators, who weigh their prior beliefs more strongly than controls, giving rise to more conditioned hallucinations. Results indicate that fundamentally different perceptual processes may be at the core of these seemingly similar experiences.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?