Abstract:We explore strategies aimed at reducing the amount of computation, both quantum and classical, required to run the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). First, following Wurtz et al. [<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Phys.Rev" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> A 104:052419], we consider the standard QAOA with instance-independent "tree" parameters chosen in advance. These tree parameters are chosen to optimize the MaxCut expectation for large girth graphs. We provide extensive numerical evidence supporting the performance guarantee for tree parameters conjectured in [<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Phys.Rev" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> A 103:042612] and see that the approximation ratios obtained with tree parameters are typically well beyond the conjectured lower bounds, often comparable to performing a full optimization. This suggests that in practice, the QAOA can achieve near-optimal performance without the need for parameter optimization. Next, we modify the warm-start QAOA of Tate et al. [Quantum 7:1121]. The starting state for the QAOA is now an optimized product state associated with a solution of the Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithm. Surprisingly, the tree parameters continue to perform well for the warm-start QAOA. We find that for random 3-regular graphs with hundreds of vertices, the expected cut obtained by the warm-start QAOA at depth $p \gtrsim 3$ is comparable to that of the standard GW algorithm. Our numerics on random instances do not provide general performance guarantees but do provide substantial evidence that there exists a regime of instance sizes in which the QAOA finds good solutions at low depth without the need for parameter optimization. For each instance studied, we classically compute the expected size of the QAOA distribution of cuts; producing the actual cuts requires running on a quantum computer.

Short-depth QAOA circuits and quantum annealing on higher-order ising models

Scaling Whole-Chip QAOA for Higher-Order Ising Spin Glass Models on Heavy-Hex Graphs

On Quantum Annealing Without a Physical Quantum Annealer

QAOA of the Highest Order

Deep-Circuit QAOA

Performance of quantum annealing inspired algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems

Strategies for running the QAOA at hundreds of qubits

QAOA Performance in Noisy Devices: The Effect of Classical Optimizers and Ansatz Depth

Tight Lieb-Robinson Bound for approximation ratio in Quantum Annealing

Comparing Three Generations of D-Wave Quantum Annealers for Minor Embedded Combinatorial Optimization Problems

The effect of classical optimizers and Ansatz depth on QAOA performance in noisy devices

Tight Lieb–Robinson Bound for approximation ratio in quantum annealing

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm with Cat Qubits

Mapping constrained optimization problems to quantum annealing with application to fault diagnosis

Connecting the Hamiltonian structure to the QAOA performance and energy landscape

Optimizing QAOA: Success Probability and Runtime Dependence on Circuit Depth

Benchmarking Metaheuristic-Integrated QAOA against Quantum Annealing

Solving SAT and MaxSAT with a Quantum Annealer: Foundations, Encodings, and Preliminary Results

Classical Combinatorial Optimization Scaling for Random Ising Models on 2D Heavy-Hex Graphs

Quantum versus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses

Efficient Classical Computation of Quantum Mean Values for Shallow QAOA Circuits