A bibliographic review of the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being

Yuchen Zhou,Qingxu Huang,Chunyang He,Peiyuan Chen,Dan Yin,Yihan Zhou,Yansong Bai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04791-3

IF: 4.08

2024-04-05

Environment Development and Sustainability

Abstract:Although the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being (REH) has been widely recognized and has become an important basis for policy-making, a quantitative review of the relationship is still lacking. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of empirical studies focusing on the REH based on the PRISMA framework. Our review highlighted the progress and challenges in terms of conceptual frameworks, methods, and major themes. We found that there was no consensus on the classification systems for human well-being, and only 35% of the empirical studies applied one of these systems. More than half (53%) of empirical studies on REH were qualitative, and the participatory approaches were the most popular method. In terms of the types of ecosystem services and human well-being, provisioning services and basic material for a good life received the most attention with 191 (out of 482) and 57 (out of 131) mentions, respectively. Future research must be more clearly framed in terms of defining types of human well-being. Methodologically, on the one hand, we should factor in stakeholder preferences and characteristics through the participatory approaches. On the other hand, we should develop methods revealing the mechanisms and pathways between ecosystem services and human well-being.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology