Research on the Educational Tourism Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Suitability, Spatial Pattern, and Obstacle Factor

Lin Meng,Fengjuan Yan,Qi Fang,Wentao Si
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114647
IF: 3.9
2024-05-31
Sustainability
Abstract:Combining the Intangible Cultural Heritage and sustainable development has been an important effort of UNESCO since the new century. This study discusses the suitability of educational tourism development of intangible cultural heritage. On the one hand, it was beneficial to improve the comprehensive quality of students; on the other hand, it was conducive to protecting and rationally developing the cultural heritage and avoiding its loss. In this study, an evaluation index system was established according to the analytic hierarchy process, which included two aspects (i.e., intrinsic value and extrinsic conditions) and 16 indices from four criterion layers (e.g., educational value, recreational value, environmental conditions, and relevant facilities and services). Furthermore, we calculated the development suitability and spatial distribution patterns of intangible cultural heritage for educational tourism. At the same time, using the obstacle degree model, the obstacle degrees of each indicator factor were screened and identified to explore the source of obstacles that restrict the suitability of educational tourism development of ICH. Results showed that: (1) The development suitability of intangible cultural heritage for educational tourism was divided into high suitability, middle suitability, and low suitability. A total of 186 intangible cultural heritages were found in Shandong Province, China. Among these intangible cultural heritages, 60 of 186 (32.26%) were low suitability, with values ranging from 0.326 to 0.460; 86 of 186 (46.24%) were middle suitability, with values of 0.460–0.543, and 40 of 186 (21.50%) were high suitability with a range of 0.543–0.689. (2) The spatial distribution patterns of suitability showed that the development suitability of intangible cultural heritage for educational tourism in Shandong Province exhibited a significantly positive spatial correlation that projects with similar suitability levels were clustered into a group and generally distributed with a direction of "southwest to the northeast". (3) According to the diagnostic results of obstacle factor analysis, from the perspective of the first level indicator, the obstacle degree of the intrinsic value (A1) of the three levels of suitability of ICH was the highest. Among the second-level indicators, educational value (B1) has always been the biggest obstacle factor affecting the educational tourism of ICH, and the relevance of cultural content (C2), representativeness and typicality of the phenomenon (C3), applicability of teaching cases (C4), and uniqueness or rarity (C5) were the greatest among the three suitability factors.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the suitability of the development of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) in educational tourism, spatial distribution patterns, and obstacles. The study establishes an evaluation index system consisting of 16 indicators from the aspects of intrinsic value and external conditions, and evaluates the development potential of ICH in educational tourism from four criteria: educational value, entertainment value, environmental conditions, and related facilities and services. Through case analysis in Shandong Province, the study found: 1. The suitability of ICH for educational tourism is divided into three levels: high, medium, and low. Among the 186 intangible cultural heritages in Shandong Province, 32.26%, 46.24%, and 21.50% are classified as low, medium, and high suitability levels, respectively. 2. The spatial distribution pattern shows that ICH suitable for the development of educational tourism in Shandong Province exhibits significant positive spatial correlation, with projects of similar suitability clustered together and an overall distribution trend from southwest to northeast. 3. The analysis of obstacles shows that, in terms of primary indicators, the intrinsic value (A1) has the highest degree of obstruction to the three suitability levels. Among the secondary indicators, educational value (B1) is always the biggest obstacle to ICH educational tourism, and the relevance of cultural content (C2), representativeness and typicality of phenomena (C3), applicability of teaching cases (C4), and uniqueness or rarity (C5) are the main obstacles among the three suitability factors. The innovations of the paper are: 1. Fully considering intrinsic value and external conditions, it selects quantitative and qualitative indicators to evaluate the suitability of ICH for educational tourism in batches. 2. Analyzing the spatial distribution patterns of ICH at different levels of suitability. 3. Providing a new approach combining ICH with education, enriching the theoretical research outcomes of the integration of ICH and tourism development, and providing scientific guidance and decision-making basis for local governments to develop ICH educational tourism. In conclusion, the paper aims to address how to assess and promote the sustainable development of Intangible Cultural Heritage in educational tourism, as well as how to overcome obstacles.