Abstract:<span> Since the first publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee opinion in 2012, and following the update in 2017, multiple institutions in the United States (US) adopted the practice of delayed cord clamping (DCC) and/or umbilical cord milking (UCM) in preterm and term infants. However, there have been variations reported in practices with regard to method of placental transfusion, timing of cord clamping and gestational age thresholds. Furthermore, the optimal cord clamping practice in situations of depressed infants needing resuscitation or in higher-risk delivery situations, such as placental abruption, intrauterine growth restriction, multiple gestation, chorioamnionitis, maternal human immunodeficiency virus syndrome/hepatitis or maternal general anesthesia is often debated. An evaluation of these variations and exploration of associated factors was needed to optimally target opportunities for improvement and streamline research activities. The objective of this survey, specifically aimed at neonatologists working in the US was to identify and describe current cord clamping practices and evaluate factors associated with variations. The survey was distributed electronically to the US neonatologists in August 2019 with a reminder email sent in October 2019. Clinicians were primarily identified from Perinatal Section of AAP, with reminders also sent through various organizations including California Association of Neonatologists, Pediatrix and Envision national groups. Descriptive variables of interest included years of experience practicing neonatology, affiliation with a teaching institution, level of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and practicing region of the US. Questions on variations in cord management practices included information about center specific guideline/protocol, cord clamping practices, gestational age threshold of placental transfusion, performance of UCM and practice in higher-risk delivery situations. The response rate was 14.8%. Among 517 neonatologists whom responded, majority (85.5%) of the practices had a guideline and performed (81.7%) DCC in all gestational ages. The cord clamping practice was predominantly DCC and it was categorized as reporting clamping times <60 s in 46.6% and ≥60 s in 48.7% of responses. A significant association was detected between time of delay in cord clamping and region of practice. The Northeast region was more likely to clamp the cord in <60 s than other regions in the US. More than half of the providers responded not performing any UCM (57.3%) in their practice. Significant associations were detected between performance of UCM and all queried demographic variables independently. Clinicians with >20 years of experience were more likely from institutions performing UCM compared to the providers with fewer years of experience. However, teaching hospitals were less likely to perform UCM compared to non-teaching hospitals. Similarly, practices with level IV NICUs were less likely to perform UCM compared to practices with level III units. Hospitals in the Midwest region of US were less likely to perform UCM compared to hospitals in the Western region. Significant variations were also noticed for not providing placental transfusion in higher-risk deliveries. Demographic and professional factors were noted to be associated with these differences. Although the majority of practices have a guideline/protocol and are performing DCC in all gestational ages, there are variations noted with regard to timing, method, and performance in higher-risk deliveries. Demographic and professional factors play an important role in these variations. Future research needs to focus on the modifiable factors to optimize the procedure and impact of DCC.</span>

Neonatal healthcare professionals' experiences of intact cord resuscitation in the mother ́s bed- an interview study

Revolutionizing Neonatal Care: A Comprehensive Review of Intact Cord Resuscitation in Newborns

Midwives' Experiences of Intact Cord Resuscitation in Nonvigorous Neonates After Vaginal Birth in Sweden

Delivery Room Resuscitation Intensity and Associated Neonatal Outcomes of 24 +0 –31 +6 Weeks’ Preterm Infants in China: a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Umbilical cord management in newborn resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neonatal transitional support with intact umbilical cord in assisted vaginal deliveries: a quality-improvement cohort study

Neonatal resuscitation for the preterm infant: evidence versus practice

Safety of different cord clamping strategies on the early postnatal period

Achieving optimal cord management: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative

Efficacy of Intact Cord Resuscitation Compared to Immediate Cord Clamping on Cardiorespiratory Adaptation at Birth in Infants with Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CHIC)

Parental experience of interaction with healthcare professionals during their infant’s stay in the neonatal intensive care unit

An update on factors affecting umbilical cord care among mothers: A review

Variations in umbilical cord clamping practices in the United States: a national survey of neonatologists

Physiological-Based Cord Clamping: When the Baby Is Ready for Clamping

Cord pilot trial, comparing alternative policies for timing of cord clamping before 32 weeks gestation: follow-up for women up to one year

Mothers' experiences of having their newborn child in a neonatal intensive care unit

Epidemiological Investigation on the Current Practice of Umbilical Cord Clamping in China.

The impact of umbilical cord care education given to Primiparous mothers on cord separation time: A randomized controlled study

Experiences of parents with very premature‐born children at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders: A qualitative study

Data collection in neonatal retrieval medicine: a platform for research and improvement

ECI biocommentary: Shiraz Badurdeen