Abstract:This study seeks to fill this gap by examining the impacts of market-rate development, subsidized development, and tenant protections, including rent stabilization and just cause for evictions protections, on movers. Specifically, this study builds two unique and cross-validated datasets on mobility and links them to a bespoke block-level housing construction database. We use granular data on individual and household mobility to assess how specific housing interventions impact both direct and indirect displacement by looking at moves both out of and into neighborhoods with different characteristics in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area. Our research reveals that new market-rate construction in a neighborhood results in a slight increase in people of all income levels moving in and moving out, i.e., churn. The increase in rates of displacement (involuntary moves) for very low- to moderate-socio-economic groups is not as high as commonly feared, at 0.5% to 2% above normal rates. However, the highest socio-economic group disproportionately benefits from new market-rate housing production—they are the least likely to move out and the most likely to move into neighborhoods with new construction. We also find that rent stabilization and just cause eviction protections help residents of the lowest socio-economic status remain in their neighborhoods. At the same time, these protections may have exclusionary impacts as we find that fewer low-income people move into neighborhoods with tenant protections. Together, these findings suggest that equitable solutions to the housing crisis will require more than just upzoning and tenant protections—these are complementary solutions, but not enough. Preserving unsubsidized affordable housing and substantially expanding social housing would help mitigate displacement and exclusion while addressing the housing affordability crisis through market rate housing production and tenant protections. Social housing is the provision of rental or homeownership units affordable at a moderate income or below, and is run by a public or nonprofit entity. To work, it would need to be widely implemented, requiring government investment at levels that match the urgency of the housing crisis. What follows is a short summary of the main findings of the study. Practitioner-oriented findings on the implications of new production, subsidized development, and tenant protections will be presented in a series of forthcoming policy briefs by the authors.

Movin' on up? The impacts of a large-scale housing lottery in Uruguay

Improvements in habitability and housing satisfaction after dwelling regeneration in social housing complexes. The RUCAS study

Creating Moves to Opportunity: Experimental Evidence on Barriers to Neighborhood Choice

Rural Land Transfer and Urban Settlement Intentions of Rural Migrants: Evidence from a Rural Land System Reform in China

Evaluating the impact of social housing policies: Measuring accessibility changes when individuals move to social housing projects

Should I stay or should I go? Housing and residential mobility across OECD countries?

Home sweet home: Impacts of living conditions on worker migration with evidence from randomized resettlement in China

Residential Mobility, Gentrification and Neighborhood Change in Spanish Cities: A Post-Crisis Perspective

Selection and educational attainment: why some children are left behind? Evidence from a middle-income country

Financing climate-related resettlements in uneven geographies of risk: Lessons from Bogota Humana

Assessing exclusionary displacement through rent gap analysis in the high-rise redevelopment of Santiago, Chile

Life Out of the Shadows: The Impacts of Regularization Programs on the Lives of Forced Migrants

The short- and long-term determinants of fertility in Uruguay

Housing Market Interventions and Residential Mobility in the San Francisco Bay Area

Urban segregation on a micro scale: the consequences for the low-income residents of a socioeconomically mixed neighborhood in Mexico city

The importance of administrative data in the evaluation of the incidence of social housing allowance programmes

Effect of Socio-Economic Stratification on House Value in Bogotá

The Effects of Rental Assistance Programs on Neighborhood Outcomes for U.S. Children: Nationwide Evidence by Program and Race/Ethnicity

Advancing Choice in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: Source of Income Protections and Locational Outcomes

Urban Public Works in Spatial Equilibrium: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia

Randomization Inference for Before-and-After Studies with Multiple Units: An Application to a Criminal Procedure Reform in Uruguay