Abstract:The sensitivity of DNA analysis has progressed to the point that trace levels of DNA, originating from only a few cells, can generate informative profiles. This means that virtually any item or surface can be sampled with a reasonable chance of obtaining a DNA profile. As the presence of DNA does not suggest how it was deposited, questions are often raised as to how the DNA came to be at a particular location and the activity that led to its deposition. Therefore, understanding different modes of DNA deposition, reflective of realistic forensic casework situations, is critical for proper evaluation of DNA results in court. This study aimed to follow the movements of DNA to and from individuals and common household surfaces in a residential premises, while socially interacting. This took place over an hour and involved four participants, with known shedder status, designated as visitors (a male and a female) and hosts (a male and a female), who engaged in the activity of playing a board game while being served food. During the study, the participants were instructed to use the toilet on a single occasion to assess the transfer of DNA to new and unused underwear that was provided. All contacts made by the participants in the dining room and kitchen were video recorded to follow the movements of DNA. Samples were collected based on the history of contact, which included hands, fingernails and penile swabs. Direct contacts resulted in detectable transfer (LR > 1) in 87 % (87/100) of the non-intimate samples and clothing. For surfaces touched by multiple participants, DNA from the person who made the last contact was not always detectable. The duration and number of contacts did not significantly affect the detection of the person contacting the item. On the other hand, presence of background DNA and participant's shedder status appear to play an important role. Further, unknown contributors were detected in the majority of samples. Finally, indirect transfer was observed on a number of occasions including co-habiting partners of guests who were not present at the study location. The results of this study may assist with decision making for exhibit selection or targeting areas for sampling within the home environment. Our findings can also be used in conjunction with previous literature to develop activity-level evaluations in such situations where the source of the DNA is conceded, but the mode of deposition is disputed.

Face reality - consider face touching behaviour on subsequent DNA analysis

Where did it go? A study of DNA transfer in a social setting

Transfer and persistence of intruder DNA within an office after reuse by owner

Detection of invisible biological traces in relation to the physicochemical properties of substrates surfaces in forensic casework

The Importance of Background DNA Analysis

Investigative use of human environmental DNA in forensic genetics

Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs

Air DNA forensics: Novel air collection method investigations for human DNA identification

Monitoring cell loss through repetitive deposition

Unintentional effects of cleaning a crime scene-when the sponge becomes an accomplice in DNA transfer

Contrasting results of surface metrology techniques for three-dimensional human fingerprints

Who threw that stone? A study on DNA transfer

Up in the air: Presence and collection of DNA from air and air conditioner units

Quantification of Touch DNA on Glass, Plastic, and Ceramic Glasses

Direct and Secondary Transfer of Touch DNA on a Credit Card: Evidence Evaluation Given Activity Level Propositions and Application of Bayesian Networks

Most Self-Touches Are with the Nondominant Hand

The effect of handedness and biological sex on fingermark ridge height and volume as examined by 3D imaging

Refraining from spontaneous face touch is linked to personality traits, reduced memory performance and EEG changes

DNA transfer in forensic science: A review

Number of Facial Hair Corresponds to Frequency of Spontaneous Face-Touch in Humans

FaceOff: Detecting Face Touching with a Wrist-Worn Accelerometer