The impact of ankle–foot orthoses on mobility of dual-task walking in stroke patients? A cross-sectional two-factor factorial design clinical trial

Rong ChenHuan ChenShilin LiPeihua CaoLonglong HeYijin ZhaoZijun HeZe GongGuozhi HuangQing Zenga Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,People's Republic of Chinab Clinical Research Center,Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,People's Republic of Chinac Department of Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,People's Republic of Chinad School of Rehabilitation Medicine,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,People's Republic of China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2343155
2024-04-27
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Abstract:To assess the impact of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on mobility and gait during dual-task walking in post-stroke survivors. In this cross-sectional, factorial design trial, stroke survivors performed four randomized tasks: (1) dual-task walking with AFOs, (2) single-task walking with AFOs, (3) dual-task walking without AFOs, and (4) single-task walking without AFOs. Primary outcome was the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, with secondary outcomes including gait metrics, Tinetti scores, and auditory N-back tests. In the results, 48 subjects (38 males and 10 females; 19-65 years) completed the trial. Patients had a greater TUG score with AFOs compared with non-AFOs conditions (95% CI: 7.22–14.41, P < 0.001) in single-task and dual-task conditions. Secondary outcomes showed marked enhancement with AFOs during dual-task walking, with significant interaction effects in gait metrics, balance, and cognitive function ( P < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, dual-task effects of TUG and walking speed were more pronounced during dual-task walking. In conclusion, AFOs enhance mobility and gait during both single and dual-task walking in post-stroke survivors.
psychology,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?