Availability and affordability of medicines and cardiovascular outcomes in 21 high-income, middle-income and low-income countries

Clara Kayei Chow,Tu Ngoc Nguyen,Simone Marschner,Rafael Diaz,Omar Rahman,Alvaro Avezum,Scott A Lear,Koon Teo,Karen E Yeates,Fernando Lanas,Wei Li,Bo Hu,Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo,Rajeev Gupta,Rajesh Kumar,Prem K Mony,Ahmad Bahonar,Khalid Yusoff,Rasha Khatib,Khawar Kazmi,Antonio L Dans,Katarzyna Zatonska,Khalid F Alhabib,Iolanthe Marike Kruger,Annika Rosengren,Sadi Gulec,Afzalhussein Yusufali,Jephat Chifamba,Sumathy Rangarajan,Martin McKee,Salim Yusuf,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002640
IF: 8.056
2020-11-01
BMJ Global Health
Abstract:Objectives We aimed to examine the relationship between access to medicine for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among people at high risk of CVD in high-income countries (HICs), upper and lower middle-income countries (UMICs, LMICs) and low-income countries (LICs) participating in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Methods We defined high CVD risk as the presence of any of the following: hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke, smoker, diabetes or age >55 years. Availability and affordability of blood pressure lowering drugs, antiplatelets and statins were obtained from pharmacies. Participants were categorised: group 1—all three drug types were available and affordable, group 2—all three drugs were available but not affordable and group 3—all three drugs were not available. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with nested clustering at country and community levels, adjusting for comorbidities, sociodemographic and economic factors. Results Of 163 466 participants, there were 93 200 with high CVD risk from 21 countries (mean age 54.7, 49% female). Of these, 44.9% were from group 1, 29.4% from group 2 and 25.7% from group 3. Compared with participants from group 1, the risk of MACEs was higher among participants in group 2 (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.31), and among participants from group 3 (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.50). Conclusion Lower availability and affordability of essential CVD medicines were associated with higher risk of MACEs and mortality. Improving access to CVD medicines should be a key part of the strategy to lower CVD globally.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the relationship between the availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease (CVD) medications and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among high-risk populations. The study evaluates the availability and affordability of antihypertensive drugs, antiplatelet drugs, and statins in 21 countries with different income levels, specifically high-income countries (HICs), upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), and low-income countries (LICs). Specifically, the study divides participants into three groups: 1. **All three medications are available and affordable** (Group 1) 2. **All three medications are available but not affordable** (Group 2) 3. **All three medications are not available** (Group 3) The study found that participants in Group 2 and Group 3 had a higher risk of MACEs compared to those in Group 1, with risks being 1.19 times and 1.25 times higher, respectively. Additionally, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in Group 2 and Group 3 compared to Group 1. The results indicate that improving the availability and affordability of CVD medications is crucial for reducing the incidence and mortality of cardiovascular diseases globally. This is particularly important in low- and middle-income countries, where the lack of medications and high costs severely impact patient outcomes.