Primary Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Bone Metastases from Lung Adenocarcinoma

Kuan-Nien Chou,David J. Park,Yusuke S. Hori,Amit R. Persad,Cynthia Chuang,Sara C. Emrish,Louisa Ustrzynski,Armine Tayag,Kiran Kumar,Melissa Usoz,Maria Mendoza,Elham Rahimy,Erqi Pollom,Scott G. Soltys,Shiue-Wei Lai,Steven D. Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.05.007
IF: 4.84
2024-05-27
Clinical Lung Cancer
Abstract:Objective This study aimed to assess the results of primary stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM) originating from lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). We considered the revised Tokuhashi score (rTS), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and genetic characteristics. Methods We examined adult patients with lung ADC who underwent primary SBRT (using the CyberKnife System) for SBM between March 2012 and January 2023. Results We analyzed data from 99 patients, covering 152 SBM across 194 vertebrae. The local control (LC) rate was 77.6% for SBM from lung ADC. The median period for local progression occurrence was recorded at 10.0 (3-52) months. Additionally, Asian patients demonstrated higher LC rates than White patients. Utilizing the rTS and SINS as predictive tools, we revealed that a poor survival prognosis and an unstable spinal structure were associated with increased rates of LP. Furthermore, the presence of osteolytic bone destructions and pain complaints were significantly correlated with the occurrence of LP. In the cohort of this study, 108 SBM underwent analysis to determine the expression levels of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Additionally, within this group, 60 showed mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alongside PD-L1 expression. Nevertheless, these genetic differences did not result in statistically significant differences in the LC rate. Conclusion The LC rate for primary SBRT targeting SBM from lung ADC stood at 77.6%, particularly with the use of the CyberKnife System. Patients achieving LC exhibited significantly longer survival times compared to those with LP.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?