Effectiveness of Back care education Programme among school children: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Canice Chukwudi Anyachukwu,Confidence Chinemerem Amarah,Blessing Chiagozikam Atueyi,Ifeanyi Anthony,Martins Nweke,Ukachukwu Abaraogu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04563-y
2024-02-04
BMC Pediatrics
Abstract:Systematic review of Randomised controlled trials. With the increasing incidence of back pain among children and its untold implications to their future, back education tailored in an effective way would be indicated. However literature appears unsettled. This study aims to review available literature to determine the effect of school-based back education in preventing and managing low back pain in school children.
pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness of back care education programs implemented in schools in preventing and managing low - back pain in children and adolescents (18 years old or younger). Specifically, the study aims to determine the effectiveness of back care education in the school context in reducing the incidence of low - back pain, improving back behavior and knowledge through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. ### Research Background The incidence of low - back pain in children and adolescents is gradually increasing and has an unknown impact on their future. Therefore, effective back care education has become particularly important. However, the existing literature is controversial about the effectiveness of such education. The goal of this study is to synthesize the existing literature evidence to determine whether back care education programs in schools are effective. ### Main Research Questions 1. **Can back care education programs effectively prevent and manage low - back pain in children and adolescents?** 2. **Are these education programs effective in improving back care knowledge and behavior in children and adolescents?** ### Research Methods - **Research Design**: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. - **Inclusion Criteria**: The research subjects are primary and secondary school students aged 6 to 18, and the research was published between 2000 and March 2022, and the language is English. - **Exclusion Criteria**: Back care education research conducted in hospitals or other environments, and non - English research. - **Data Sources**: Relevant literature was retrieved from PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane, Google Scholar and HINARI databases. - **Quality Assessment**: The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of the research. ### Main Findings - **Back Behavior**: A total of 4 studies evaluated back behavior, and the results showed that the back behavior in the intervention group was significantly improved. - **Back Care Knowledge**: A total of 4 studies evaluated back care knowledge, and all studies reported a significant increase in knowledge. - **Incidence of Low - Back Pain**: Two studies evaluated the incidence of low - back pain. One of the studies showed that the incidence of low - back pain in the intervention group was significantly reduced, while the other study did not find a significant difference. - **Other Results**: Including postural habits, backpack - carrying methods, physical activity, fear - avoidance beliefs, pain intensity, skills and self - efficacy, etc., most studies reported positive results. ### Conclusions Back care education programs in schools are effective in improving back care knowledge and behavior in children and adolescents, but the effectiveness in reducing the incidence of low - back pain is still unclear. Therefore, it is recommended to include back care education in the regular education programs of schools to promote the health of students. ### Diversity of Methods - **Direct Education**: Including theoretical courses, practical lessons and educational materials. - **Indirect Education**: Achieved through training teachers and improving the school environment. ### Discussion - **Impact of Educational Methods**: Educational methods rich in activities are more popular among children and help to improve back behavior. Reading materials also contribute to the long - term retention of knowledge, but may not be as interesting as practical activities. - **Inconsistency of Results**: Some studies did not find significant effects, which may be related to the choice of educational methods. In general, this study provides strong support for back care education programs in schools, but also points out areas that need further research.