Abstract:The Gaofen-1 (GF-1) and Gaofen-6 (GF-6) satellites have acquired many GF-1 and GF-6 wide-field-view (WFV) images. These images have been made available for free use globally. The GF-1 WFV (GF-1) and GF-6 WFV (GF-6) images have rational polynomial coefficients (RPCs). In practical applications, RPC corrections of GF-1 and GF-6 images need to be completed using the rational function model (RFM). However, can the accuracy of the rational function model satisfy practical application requirements? To address this issue, a geometric accuracy method was proposed in this paper to evaluate the accuracy of the RFM of GF-1 and GF-6 images. First, RPC corrections were completed using the RFM and refined RFM, respectively. The RFM was constructed using the RPCs and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 90 m DEM. The RFM was refined via affine transformation based on control points (CPs), which resulted in a refined RFM. Then, an automatic matching method was proposed to complete the automatic matching of GF-1/GF-6 images and reference images, which enabled us to obtain many uniformly distributed CPs. Finally, these CPs were used to evaluate the geometric accuracy of the RFM and refined RFM. The 14th-layer Google images of the corresponding area were used as reference images. In the experiments, the advantages and disadvantages of BRIEF, SIFT, and the proposed method were first compared. Then, the values of the root mean square error (RSME) of 10,561 Chinese, French, and Brazilian GF-1 and GF-6 images were calculated and statistically analyzed, and the local geometric distortions of the GF-1 and GF-6 images were evaluated; these were used to evaluate the accuracy of the RFM. Last, the accuracy of the refined RFM was evaluated using the eight GF-1 and GF-6 images. The experimental results indicate that the accuracy of the RFM for most GF-1 and GF-6 images cannot meet the actual use requirement of being better than 1.0 pixel, the accuracy of the refined RFM for GF-1 images cannot meet practical requirement of being better than 1.0 pixel, and the accuracy of the refined RFM for most GF-6 images meets the practical requirement of being better than 1.0 pixel. However, the RMSE values that meet the requirements are between 0.9 and 1.0, and the geometric accuracy can be further improved.

Accuracy Assessment of GF-7 Geolocation Without GCPs Considering Atmospheric Refraction and Aberration of Light

Geolocation Accuracy Improvement of Multiobserved GF-3 Spaceborne SAR Imagery

Geometric Accuracy Improvement Method for High-Resolution Optical Satellite Remote Sensing Imagery Combining Multi-Temporal SAR Imagery and GLAS Data

Geo-Positioning Accuracy Improvement of Multi-Mode GF-3 Satellite SAR Imagery Based on Error Sources Analysis

Does the Rational Function Model's Accuracy for GF1 and GF6 WFV Images Satisfy Practical Requirements?

Ortho Accuracy Validation and Analysis of GF-2 PAN Imagery Based on Beidou Satellite Navigation System and GPS

Validation of GaoFen-1 Satellite Geometric Products Based on Reference Data

A New Combined Adjustment Model for Geolocation Accuracy Improvement of Multiple Sources Optical and SAR Imagery

Geolocation Accuracy Validation of High-Resolution SAR Satellite Images Based on the Xianning Validation Field

An Error-Based Block Adjustment Method For Multi-Angle Satellite Imagery Without Ground Control Points

High-Resolution Spaceborne SAR Geolocation Accuracy Analysis and Error Correction

An Accurate Calculation of the Atmospheric Refraction Error of Optical Remote Sensing Images Based on the Fine-Layered Light Vector Method

A study of high-precision stereo positioning with multi-scene and multi-mode GF-3 satellite images

Geometric Calibration and Accuracy Verification of the GF-3 Satellite

Accuracy Evaluation on Geolocation of the Chinese First Polar Microsatellite (Ice Pathfinder) Imagery

On-Orbit Radiometric Performance of GF-7 Satellite Multispectral Imagery

High precision geometric correction based on DEM data and GCP outlier detection for MODIS data

A Separate Calibration Method of Laser Pointing and Ranging for the GF-7 Satellite Laser That Does Not Require Field Detectors

Block Adjustment Without GCPs for Chinese Spaceborne SAR GF-3 Imagery.

POINTING BIAS CALIBRATION OF GAOFEN-7 LASER ALTIMETER BASED ON SINGLE LASER FOOTPRINT IMAGE

High Precision Airborne Sar Geometric Calibration And Geolocation Based On An Improved Near Range Model