Gender Differences in the Frequency of Aggression in Dreams: A Meta-Analysis.
Lei Zhang,Nanfang Pan,Taolin Chen,Song Wang,Jianling Gu,Xun Yang,Yan Shi,Qiyong Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000127
IF: 2.212
2020-01-01
Dreaming
Abstract:Although some studies have indicated notable gender differences in the frequency of aggressive dreams, heterogeneous results have also been reported, and this difference has not yet been explored systematically. We investigated the gender differences in the frequency of aggressive dreams by performing a meta-analysis of existing articles following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Finally, 12 eligible studies (14 databases) that included 3,294 (men = 1,522, women = 1,772) participants were identified. The pooled estimate of the odds ratio (OR) was 1.346 (95% confidence interval [CI; 1.156, 1.567], p =.001), which indicated that the frequency of aggression in men's dreams was significantly higher than that in women's dreams. This gender difference was significant in the child group (OR = 1.465, 95% CI [1.045, 2.055], p =.027) and the adult group (OR = 1.320, 95% CI [1.069, 1.631], p =.010), but it was not statistically significant in the teenager group (OR = 1.313, 95% CI [0.986, 1.747], p =.062), which may suggest that the intense inner conflicts of teenagers break the habitual gender pattern to some extent, at least in dreams. In addition, no significant heterogeneity or publication bias was identified, with a Q statistic of p =.464 and Egger's test of p =.903, and the sensitivity analysis demonstrated the stability of the results of the present meta-analysis. The results supported the continuity hypothesis of the relation between reality and dreams to some extent.