Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles

Leonardo Henry Eusebi,S. Scarlata,A. Bertani,G. de Nucci,A. Lisotti,F. Spatola,A. Repici,D. Ligresti,L. Lamonaca,A. Ofosu,S. Crinó,C. Fabbri,S. Carrara,M. Traina,N. Muscatiello,E. Troncone,F. Auriemma,P. Fusaroli,G. Manes,A. Facciorusso,D. Paduano,G. Del Vecchio Blanco,C. Binda,B. Mangiavillano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002383
2022-04-29
Abstract:Background and aim Intraparenchymal lung masses inaccessible through bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound guidance pose a diagnostic challenge. Furthermore, some fragile or hypoxic patients may be poor candidates for transbronchial approaches. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) offers a potential diagnostic approach to lung cancers adjacent to the esophagus. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of trans-esophageal EUS-FNA/FNB for tissue sampling of pulmonary nodules. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent EUS-FNA/FNB between March 2015 and August 2021 at eight Italian endoscopic referral centers. Results A total of 47 patients (36 male; mean age 64.47 ± 9.05 years) were included (22 EUS-FNAs and 25 EUS-FNBs). Overall diagnostic accuracy rate was 88.9% (76.3–96.2%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were superior for EUS FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.73%); P = 0.05, and (100% vs. 78.57%); P = 0.05, respectively. Additionally, sample adequacy was superior for EUS-FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.5%); P = 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed nodule size at the cutoff of 15 mm (OR 2.29, 1.04–5.5, P = 0.05) and use of FNB needle (OR 4.33, 1.05–6.31, P = 0.05) as significant predictors of higher diagnostic accuracy. There were no procedure-related adverse events. Conclusion This study highlights the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA/FNB as a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosing and staging peri-esophageal parenchymal lung lesions. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA.
Medicine,Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?