MK-5475, an inhaled soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: the INSIGNIA-PAH study

Marc Humbert,Paul M. Hassoun,Kelly M. Chin,Guillermo Bortman,Mahesh J. Patel,Carmen La Rosa,Wei Fu,Maria José Loureiro,Marius M. Hoeper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01110-2024
IF: 24.3
2024-09-10
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Background MK-5475 is an investigational inhaled soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator hypothesised to avoid most side-effects of systemic vasodilation. Methods The phase 2 INSIGNIA-PAH ( NCT04732221 ) trial randomised adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) on stable background therapy 1:1:1:1 to once-daily dosing with placebo, MK-5475 32 μg, 100 μg or 380 μg via dry powder inhalation for 12 weeks. Objectives The objectives were to evaluate pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; primary), 6-min walk distance (6MWD; secondary), additional selected haemodynamic parameters, and safety and tolerability in participants with PAH. Results 168 participants were randomised to placebo (n=41), MK-5475 32 μg (n=42), 100 μg (n=44), and 380 μg (n=41). Median age was 51 years. Most participants were female (73.8%), diagnosed with idiopathic PAH (63.7%), receiving concomitant phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i; 93.5%), and treated with double or triple combination therapy (85.1%). At week 12, the placebo-corrected changes in PVR by least-squares means were −9.2% (95% CI −21.3%, 2.9%; p=0.068) with 32 μg, −22.0% (95% CI −33.7%, −10.3%; p<0.001) with 100 μg, and −19.9% (95% CI −33.4%, −6.4%; p=0.002) with 380 μg MK-5475. No treatment differences versus placebo were observed in 6MWD. Treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events were similar across treatment groups. Three participants died: two on placebo and one on MK-5475 100 μg. One participant had symptomatic hypotension and one had haemoptysis (both on MK-5475 100 μg). Conclusions In participants with PAH on stable background therapy, including PDE5i, inhaled MK-5475 reduced PVR and was well tolerated, without evidence of systemic side-effects such as hypotension, suggesting a pulmonary selective pharmacodynamic effect.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?