Abstract:Background Recently, computed tomography (CT) manufacturers have developed deep‐learning‐based reconstruction algorithms to compensate for the limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as image smoothing and the spatial resolution's dependence on contrast and dose levels. Purpose To assess the impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction (AI‐DLR) algorithm on image quality and dose reduction compared with a hybrid IR algorithm in chest CT for different clinical indications. Methods Acquisitions on the CT American College of Radiology (ACR) 464 and CT Torso CTU‐41 phantoms were performed at five dose levels (CTDIvol: 9.5/7.5/6/2.5/0.4 mGy) used for chest CT conditions. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, two levels of IR (iDose4 levels 4 (i4) and 7 (i7)), and five levels of AI‐DLR (Precise Image; Smoother, Smooth, Standard, Sharp, Sharper). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task‐based transfer function, and detectability index (d′) were computed: d′‐modeled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule (low‐contrast soft tissue chest nodule within the mediastinum [LCN]), ground‐glass opacity (GGO), or high‐contrast pulmonary (HCP) lesion. The subjective image quality of chest anthropomorphic phantom images was independently evaluated by two radiologists. They assessed image noise, image smoothing, contrast between vessels and fat in the mediastinum for mediastinal images, visual border detection between bronchus and lung parenchyma for parenchymal images, and overall image quality using a commonly used four‐ or five‐point scale. Results From Standard to Smoother levels, on average, the noise magnitude decreased (for all dose levels: −66.3% ± 0.5% for mediastinal images and −63.1% ± 0.1% for parenchymal images), the average NPS spatial frequency decreased (for all dose levels: −35.3% ± 2.2% for mediastinal images and −13.3% ± 2.2% for parenchymal images), and the detectability (d′) of the three lesions increased. The opposite pattern was found from Standard to Sharper levels. From Smoother to Sharper levels, the spatial resolution increased for the low‐contrast polyethylene insert and the opposite for the high‐contrast air insert. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d′ values were higher using Smoother (mean for all dose levels: 338.7% ± 29.4%), Smooth (103.4% ± 11.2%), and Standard (34.1% ± 6.6%) levels for the LCN on mediastinal images and Smoother (169.5% ± 53.2% for GGO and 136.9% ± 1.6% for HCP) and Smooth (36.4% ± 22.1% and 24.1% ± 0.9%, respectively) levels for parenchymal images. Radiologists considered the images satisfactory for clinical use at these levels, but adaptation to the dose level of the protocol is required. Conclusion With AI‐DLR, the smoothest levels reduced the noise and improved the detectability of chest lesions but increased the image smoothing. The opposite was found with the sharpest levels. The choice of level depends on the dose level and type of image: mediastinal or parenchymal.

Diagnostic CT of colorectal cancer with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction: A clinical evaluation

Artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT of patients with irregular arm positioning: a case-by-case evaluation

Image quality assessment of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for low dose aortic CTA: A feasibility study of 70 kVp and reduced contrast medium volume

An Evaluation Analysis for Computed Tomography Image Quality of Primary Liver Cancer Lesions Based on Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

Impact of deep learning image reconstruction algorithms on CT radiomic features in patients with liver tumors

Improved image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT with deep-learning reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study

Using deep learning to recognize local advanced rectal cancer in CT images.

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Ultra-low-dose CT Reconstructed with the Artificial Intelligence Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (AIIR) in 18F-FDG Total-Body PET/CT Examination: a Preliminary Study

MRI‐Based Artificial Intelligence in Rectal Cancer

Precision Identification of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Denoised CT Scans Using EfficientNet and Voting System Algorithms

Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: A prospective study

Artificial intelligence CT radiomics to predict early recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study

Improving prediction of treatment response and prognosis in colorectal cancer with AI-based medical image analysis

The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Improves the Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Colonography

Applying a CT texture analysis model trained with deep‐learning reconstruction images to iterative reconstruction images in pulmonary nodule diagnosis

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.

Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose Liver CT with Deep Learning Reconstruction versus Standard-Dose CT.

Multicenter Comparison of AI Deep Learning Reconstruction, Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring

Impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study