Abstract:Background: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) implemented a new standard in 2014 requiring employers to report nearly all work-related inpatient hospitalizations within 24 h of the event. We examined the characteristics of the injured workers who were reported and the compliance of Michigan employers with the regulation. Methods: From 2016 to 2018, we compared reports of acute nonmotor-vehicle work-related injuries and illnesses from two independent datasets, employer reports to OSHA and the Michigan Multi-Source Injury and Illness Surveillance System (MMSIISS) which collects injured worker hospital records from the 134 hospitals in Michigan. We matched records from employer reports to OSHA with the MMSIISS by employee's first and last name, company name, date of injury/illness, and type of injury/illness. Results: We identified 2887 workers hospitalized with severe injuries/illnesses from 2016 to 2018 in Michigan; 1260 workers were reported by employers to OSHA and 2238 workers were reported by hospitals to the MMSIISS. There was an overlap of 611 workers reported in both systems, while 649 workers were only reported by employers to OSHA and 1627 workers were only reported by hospitals to the MMSIISS. Employer compliance with the regulation over the 3 years showed a nonsignificant increase; from 42.0% to 43.6% to 45.0%. Fractures were the most frequent type of injury (1238, 42.9%), then head injuries, including skull fractures (470, 16.3%). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days. Manufacturing (709, 25.5%) and construction (563, 20.3%), accounted for the greatest number of hospitalizations. Employer-reported cases to OSHA significantly undercounted hospitalized workers in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; construction; finance and insurance; real estate and rental and leasing; administrative and support and waste management and remediation services; arts, entertainment, and recreation; accommodation and food services; and other services except public administration. Companies with 250 or more employees were significantly more likely to comply and small companies with 10 or fewer employees were significantly less likely to comply with the reporting rule. Enforcement inspections at 465 of the workplaces where a hospitalization had occurred resulted in $1,017,835 in fines and identified 608 violations. Of the 465 inspections, 246 (52.9%) of the employers had not corrected the hazard before the inspection. Conclusions: This study identified that workers sustained severe injuries and illnesses on the job and that over half of the companies where a worker suffered an injury/illness leading to hospitalization were not in compliance with OSHA's reporting regulation. Furthermore, at the time of an inspection 1-5 months later, 50% of the companies had not corrected the hazard causing the hospitalization. Improvement in the reporting of work-related injuries/illnesses that result in hospitalization will identify more ongoing hazards in the workplace and improve where to focus preventive actions.

The wages of irregular tasks: workers' compensation benefits and occupational misclassification

The Effect of Local Area Unemployment on Compensating Wage Differentials for Injury Risk

An alternative approach to understanding occupational safety and health (OSH): an empirical insurance cost perspective in Italy

Workplace Accidents and Self-Organized Criticality

Urban-Rural Differences in the Duration of Injury-Related Work Disability in Six Canadian Provinces

Workforce Composition, Productivity, and Labor Regulations in a Compensating Differentials Theory of Informality

Compensability of Workers' Compensation Claims for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WRMDS) Using Logistic Regression: An Empirical Study of an Appliance Manufacturer

Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: a case study and review of the literature

A Sorting Model of Labor Contracts: Implications for Layoffs and Wage-Tenure Profiles

Is precarious employment an occupational hazard? Evidence from Ontario, Canada

Does unemployment affect compensating wage differentials for work-related fatal injuries? Empirical evidence from occupational data

Examining the impact of occupational health and safety vulnerability on injury claim reporting in three Canadian provinces

Are Chinese Workers Compensated for Occupational Risk

The Impact of Benefit Generosity on Workers’ Compensation Claims: Evidence and Implications

The Estimation of Compensating Wage Differentials: Lessons From the Deadliest Catch

Using Workers' Compensation Claims Data to Describe Nonfatal Injuries among Workers in Alaska

The Impact of Information Frictions Within Regulators: Evidence from Workplace Safety Violations

Insuring Displaced Workers: Human Capital Losses and Severance Pay Design

Dynamic Labor Reallocation with Heterogeneous Skills and Uninsured Idiosyncratic Risk

Adding injury to insult: Unfair treatment at work and occupational injury among hospital patient‐care workers

Evaluation of the characteristics of workers injured on the job requiring hospitalization, and employer compliance with OSHA's reporting requirement for these work-related hospitalizations