Abstract:The ability to engage in goal-directed behavior despite exposure to stress is critical to resilience. Questions of how stress can impair or improve behavioral functioning are important in diverse settings, from athletic competitions to academic testing. Previous research suggests that controllability is a key factor in the impact of stress on behavior: learning how to control stressors buffers people from the negative effects of stress on subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. In addition, research suggests that the impact of stress on cognitive functioning depends on an individual's response to stressors: moderate responses to stress can lead to improved performance while extreme (high or low) responses can lead to impaired performance. The present studies tested the hypothesis that (1) learning to behaviorally control stressors leads to improved performance on a test of general executive functioning, the color-word Stroop, and that (2) this improvement emerges specifically for people who report moderate (subjective) responses to stress. Experiment 1: Stroop performance, measured before and after a stress manipulation, was compared across groups of undergraduate participants (n = 109). People who learned to control a noise stressor and received accurate performance feedback demonstrated reduced Stroop interference compared with people exposed to uncontrollable noise stress and feedback indicating an exaggerated rate of failure. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest reduction in Stroop interference. In contrast, in the group exposed to uncontrollable events, self-reported stress failed to predict performance. Experiment 2: In a second sample (n = 90), we specifically investigated the role of controllability by keeping the rate of failure feedback constant across groups. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest Stroop improvement. Once again, this pattern was not demonstrated in the group exposed to uncontrollable events. These results suggest that stress controllability and subjective response interact to affect high-level cognitive abilities. Specifically, exposure to moderate, controllable stress benefits performance, but exposure to uncontrollable stress or having a more extreme response to stress tends to harm performance. These findings may provide insights on how to leverage the beneficial effects of stress in a range of settings.

Individual Differences in Executive Functioning: Implications for Stress Regulation

Stressful Life Events and Children's Socioemotional Difficulties: Conditional Indirect Effects of Resilience and Executive Function.

Prefrontal-posterior coupling mediates emotion transitions and their influence on executive function

Components of hot and cold executive functions and their relations to different forms of stress resilience: A systematic review

The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions

Mind over mood: exploring the executive function's role in downregulation

Sleep/wake regularity influences how stress shapes executive function

Individual Differences in the Correspondence Between Psychological and Physiological Stress Indicators

Maternal executive function and stress and children’s behavior problem treatment outcomes.

Effects of Acute Laboratory Stress on Executive Functions

Recent life stress predicts blunted acute stress response and the role of executive control

ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN DAILY STRESSOR CONTROL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

To switch or not to switch? Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility.

Empirical evidence of the role of executive functions in tolerance of emotional distress

Executive Functioning Profiles in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Parent-Child Outcomes

Building Resilience: The Stress Response as a Driving Force for Neuroplasticity and Adaptation

Sex differences in cognitive regulation of psychosocial achievement stress: Brain and behavior

Executive Dysfunctions: The Role in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity and Post-traumatic Stress Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Associations Between Neuroticism and Executive Function Outcomes: Response Inhibition and Sustained Attention on a Continuous Performance Test

Acute psychosocial stress modulates neural and behavioral substrates of cognitive control