Abstract:The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) mandates European Union Member States (MS) to conduct cost-optimal studies using the national calculation methodology (NCM), typically through non-calibrated asset-rating software. Nearly zero-energy building (NZEB) levels must be derived for each chosen Reference Building (RB), which are generally defined using deterministic parameters. Previous research proposed an innovative cost-optimal method that replaces 'non-calibrated deterministic RBs' with 'probabilistically Bayesian calibrated reference building (RB)' to better handle building stock uncertainties and diversities when deriving benchmarks. This paper aims to develop a framework to address two research gaps necessary for the successful application of the innovative cost optimal method: (1) providing objective criteria for defining NZEB benchmarks and (2) propagating uncertainties and financial risk for each defined benchmark. A robust approach for defining NZEB benchmarks according to four different ambition levels (low, medium, high, and highest) was developed by objectively considering distinct points from multiple cost-optimal plots employing different financial perspectives. Risk analysis is then performed for each defined benchmark by propagating risk from the posterior calibration parameter distributions to visualize and statistically quantify the financial risk, including robust risk, that the private investor could face for reaching each derived benchmark ambition level. The innovative cost-optimal methodology that incorporates the developed framework was applied to a hotel RB case study. The results showed that the developed framework is capable of deriving distinct benchmarks and quantitatively uncovering the full financial risk levels for the four different renovation ambition levels. The current cost-optimal method was also performed for the hotel case study with the RB defined determinitically and using the non-calibrated NCM software, SBEM-mt v4.2c. It was found that the financial feasibility and energy-saving results per benchmark are significantly more realistic and transparent for the proposed innovative cost-optimal method including a better match between the simulated and metered energy consumption with a difference of less than 1% in annual performance. Thus, the performance gap between calculated and actual energy performance that is synonymous with the EPBD methodology, as reported in the literature, is bridged. The case study also showed the importance of the risk analysis. Performing the cost-optimal analysis for a Bayesian calibrated RB using the mean value of the posterior calibrated parameter distributions without propagating uncertainty produced highly optimistic results that obscured the real financial risk for achieving the higher ambition levels of the NZEB benchmarks. Consequently, the developed framework demonstrated a time-bound tightening approach to achieve higher energy performance ambitions, improve risk transparency to private investors, and facilitate more targeted policies towards a net zero-carbon status. Thus, the proposed method considering parameter uncertainty and calibrated RBs is instrumental for devising robust policy measures for the EPBD, to achieve a realistic and long-lasting sustainable energy goal for European buildings.

Linked Data Generation Methodology and the Geospatial Cross-Sectional Buildings Energy Benchmarking Use Case

The Open Data Potential for the Geospatial Characterisation of Building Stock on an Urban Scale: Methodology and Implementation in a Case Study

A holistic time series-based energy benchmarking framework for applications in large stocks of buildings

Temporal Sustainability Efficiency Analysis of Urban Areas Via Data Envelopment Analysis and the Hypervolume Indicator: Application to London Boroughs

A data-driven framework for building energy benchmarking and renovation decision-making support in Sweden

A new approach for national-scale Building Energy Models based on Energy Performance Certificates in European countries: The case of Spain

An interpretable data analytics-based energy benchmarking process for supporting retrofit decisions in large residential building stocks

Downscaling Building Energy Consumption Carbon Emissions by Machine Learning

A Novel Approach to Determine Multi-Tiered Nearly Zero-Energy Performance Benchmarks Using Probabilistic Reference Buildings and Risk Analysis Approaches

Producing domestic energy benchmarks using a large disaggregate stock model

Validating 'GIS-UBEM'—A Residential Open Data-Driven Urban Building Energy Model

The Building Data Genome Directory -- An open, comprehensive data sharing platform for building performance research

Points for Energy Renovation (PointER): A LiDAR-Derived Point Cloud Dataset of One Million English Buildings Linked to Energy Characteristics

Linking data model and formula to automate KPI calculation for building performance benchmarking

Web-Based Management of Public Buildings: A Workflow Based on Integration of BIM and IoT Sensors with a Web–GIS Portal

Building sustainable urban energy systems: The role of linked data in photovoltaic generation estimation at neighbourhood level

Accommodating new calculation approaches in next-generation energy performance assessments

Data-driven decision support system for building stocks energy retrofit policy

Building Categorization Revisited: A Clustering-Based Approach to Using Smart Meter Data for Building Energy Benchmarking

Industrial Waste Heat District-Heating Design Based on Geographic Information System: Case Study in Vitoria-Gasteiz (Spain)

Collection and Integration of Local Knowledge and Experience through a Collective Spatial Analysis