Abstract:Background: Preeclampsia screening is a critical component of antenatal care worldwide. Currently, the most developed screening test for preeclampsia at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation integrates maternal demographic characteristics and medical history with 3 biomarkers-serum placental growth factor, mean arterial pressure, and uterine artery pulsatility index-to identify approximately 75% of women who develop preterm preeclampsia with delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. It is generally accepted that further improvements to preeclampsia screening require the use of additional biomarkers. We recently reported that the levels of specific metabolites and metabolite ratios are associated with preterm preeclampsia. Notably, for several of these markers, preterm preeclampsia prediction varied according to maternal body mass index class. These findings motivated us to study whether patient classification allowed for combining metabolites with the current biomarkers more effectively to improve prediction of preterm preeclampsia. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether metabolite biomarkers can improve biomarker-based preterm preeclampsia prediction in 3 screening resource scenarios according to the availability of: (1) placental growth factor, (2) placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure, and (3) placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+uterine artery pulsatility index. Study design: This was an observational case-control study, drawn from a large prospective screening study at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation on the prediction of pregnancy complications, conducted at King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Maternal blood samples were also collected for subsequent research studies. We used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to quantify levels of 50 metabolites previously associated with pregnancy complications in plasma samples from singleton pregnancies. Biomarker data, normalized using multiples of medians, on 1635 control and 106 preterm preeclampsia pregnancies were available for model development. Modeling was performed using a methodology that generated a prediction model for preterm preeclampsia in 4 consecutive steps: (1) z-normalization of predictors, (2) combinatorial modeling of so-called (weak) classifiers in the unstratified patient set and in discrete patient strata based on body mass index and/or race, (3) selection of classifiers, and (4) aggregation of the selected classifiers (ie, bagging) into the final prediction model. The prediction performance of models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and detection rate at 10% false-positive rate. Results: First, the predictor development methodology itself was evaluated. The patient set was split into a training set (2/3) and a test set (1/3) for predictor model development and internal validation. A prediction model was developed for each of the 3 different predictor panels, that is, placental growth factor+metabolites, placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+metabolites, and placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+uterine artery pulsatility index+metabolites. For all 3 models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the test set did not differ significantly from that of the training set. Next, a prediction model was developed using the complete data set for the 3 predictor panels. Among the 50 metabolites available for modeling, 26 were selected across the 3 prediction models; 21 contributed to at least 2 out of the 3 prediction models developed. Each time, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and detection rate were significantly higher with the new prediction model than with the reference model. Markedly, the estimated detection rate with the placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+metabolites prediction model in all patients was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.70), a 15% increase (P<.001) over the detection rate of 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.55) estimated for the reference placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure. The same prediction model significantly improved detection in Black (14%) and White (19%) patients, and in the normal-weight group (18.5≤body mass index<25) and the obese group (body mass index≥30), with respectively 19% and 20% more cases detected, but not in the overweight group, when compared with the reference model. Similar improvement patterns in detection rates were found in the other 2 scenarios, but with smaller improvement amplitudes. Conclusion: Metabolite biomarkers can be combined with the established biomarkers of placental growth factor, mean arterial pressure, and uterine artery pulsatility index to improve the biomarker component of early-pregnancy preterm preeclampsia prediction tests. Classification of the pregnant women according to the maternal characteristics of body mass index and/or race proved instrumental in achieving improved prediction. This suggests that maternal phenotyping can have a role in improving the prediction of obstetrical syndromes such as preeclampsia.

Comparison of different methods of screening for preterm pre‐eclampsia: cohort study

Performance of first-trimester combined screening for preterm pre-eclampsia: findings from cohort of 10 110 pregnancies in Spain

Validation of machine-learning model for first-trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia using cohort from PREVAL study

Umbilical and middle cerebral arteries Doppler velocimetry in early and late onset pre-eclampsia

Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation

EP17.07: Comparison of different methods of screening for preterm pre‐eclampsia

Competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy according to maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation

Screening for pre-eclampsia at 35-37 weeks' gestation

Prospective Evaluation of Screening Performance of First-Trimester Prediction Models for Preterm Preeclampsia in an Asian Population

MoM cutoffs for variables, an important tool for multivariate analysis and accurate interpretation of preeclampsia risk in high-risk pregnancy at 11-13+6 weeks gestation

Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation: use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both

Serum PlGF compared with PAPP-A in first trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia: Adjusting for the effect of aspirin treatment

Development and Validation of Multi-Stage Prediction Models for Pre-eclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Chinese Women

Maternal Mid-Trimester Placental Growth Factor and Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry in Evolution of Pre-Eclampsia

Preterm preeclampsia screening using biomarkers: combining phenotypic classifiers into robust prediction models

Multicentre randomised trial of screening with sFlt1/PlGF and planned delivery to prevent pre-eclampsia at term: protocol of the PE37 study

Comparison of National Factor-based Models for Preeclampsia Screening

Uterine artery pulsatility index at 12, 22, 32 and 36 weeks' gestation in screening for pre-eclampsia

Modified multiple marker aneuploidy screening as a primary screening test for preeclampsia

Prediction of Fetal Death in Preterm Preeclampsia Using Fetal Sex, Placental Growth Factor and Gestational Age

Mean arterial blood pressure: potential predictive tool for preeclampsia in a cohort of healthy nulliparous pregnant women