Abstract:Background: The challenges associated with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) are due primarily to temporal impairment and therefore tend to affect perception of low- to midfrequency sounds. A common treatment option for severe impairment in ANSD is cochlear implantation, and because the degree of impairment is unrelated to degree of hearing loss by audiometric thresholds, this population may have significant acoustic sensitivity in the contralateral ear. Clinically, the question arises as to how we should treat the contralateral ear in this population when there is acoustic hearing-should we plug it, amplify it, implant it, or leave it alone? Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of acute amplification and plugging of the contralateral ear compared to no intervention in implanted children with ANSD and aidable contralateral hearing. It was hypothesized that due to impaired temporal processing in ANSD, contralateral acoustic input would interfere with speech perception achieved with the cochlear implant (CI) alone; therefore, speech perception performance will decline with amplification and improve with occlusion. Research design: Prospective within-subject comparison. Adaptive speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) for monosyllable and spondee word stimuli were measured in quiet and in noise for the intervention configurations. Study sample: Nine children treated at the Medical College of Wisconsin Koss Cochlear Implant Program participated in the study. Inclusion criteria for this study were children diagnosed with ANSD who were unilaterally implanted, had aidable hearing in the contralateral ear (defined as a three-frequency pure-tone average of ≤80 dB HL), had at least 1 yr of cochlear implant experience, and were able to perform the speech perception task. Intervention: We compared SRT with the CI alone to SRTs with interventions of cochlear implant with a contralateral hearing aid (CI+HA) and cochlear implant with a contralateral earplug (CI+plug). Data collection and analysis: SRTs were measured and compared within subjects across listening conditions. Within-subject comparisons were analyzed using paired t-tests, and analyses of predictive variables for effects of contralateral intervention were analyzed using linear regression. Results: Contrary to the hypothesis, the bimodal CI+HA configuration showed a significant improvement in mean performance over the CI-alone configuration in quiet (p = .04). In noise, SRTs were obtained for six subjects, and no significant bimodal benefit was observed (p = .09). There were no consistent effects of occlusion observed across subjects and stimulus conditions. Degree of bimodal benefit showed a significant relationship with performance with the CI alone, with greater bimodal benefit associated with poorer CI-alone performance (p = .01). This finding, however, was limited by floor effects. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that children with ANSD who are experienced cochlear implant users may benefit from contralateral amplification, particularly for moderate cochlear implant performers. It is unclear from these data whether long-term contralateral hearing aid use in real-world situations would ultimately benefit this population; however, a hearing aid trial is recommended with assessment of bimodal benefit over time. These data may help inform clinical guidelines for determining optimal hearing configurations for unilaterally implanted children with ANSD, particularly when considering candidacy for sequential cochlear implantation.

Changes in Listening Effort Through Pupil Response After Atresioplasty in Children With Congenital Aural Atresia

Bonebridge implants versus atresiaplasty in children with unilateral congenital aural atresia: A comparison study of audiological outcomes

Hearing rehabilitation in patients with congenital aural atresia: an observational study in a tertiary center

Congenital aural atresia and stenosis: surgery strategies and long-term results.

A Meta-Analysis of the Long-Term Hearing Outcomes and Complications Associated with Atresiaplasty.

Impact of Mild to Moderate U-shape Hearing Loss on Listening Effort in School-aged Children with Alport Syndrome

Bone Conduction Hearing in Congenital Aural Atresia.

Study in Air-Conducted and Bone-Conducted Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Congenital External Auditory Canal Atresia

Issues on aural atresia for the facial plastic surgeon

Postoperative Auditory Progress in Cochlear-Implanted Children With Auditory Neuropathy

A New Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Microtia and Congenital Aural Atresia

Anatomical Measurement of the Ossicles in Patients with Congenital Aural Atresia and Stenosis

Can Long-Term Hearing Preservation be Expected in Children following Cholesteatoma Surgery? Results from a 14-Year-Long Study of Atticotomy-Limited Mastoidectomy with Cartilage Reconstruction

Management of Acquired Aural Atresia and Stenosis: A Case Series

Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

[Audiological Basis of Continuing to Wear Hearing Aids in the Contralateral Ear of Young Children after Cochlear Implantation].

Analysis of predictive factors related to long-term hearing and temporal bone development in congenital microtia

Auricular reconstruction using Medpor combined with different hearing rehabilitation approaches for microtia

Sound lateralization ability of patients with bilateral microtia and atresia after bilateral reconstruction of auricles and external auditory canals and fitting of new canal-type hearing aids to replace a bone conduction hearing aid

Evaluating Potential Ear Canal Reconstruction for Congenital Aural Atresia Patients

The role of HRCT and three-dimensional VR CT findings in patients of congenital atresia combined with microtia