Does All Social Support Work? Examining the Mechanisms of Patient-Reported Symptom Interference after Esophagectomy Affecting Life Satisfaction
Mengmeng Yuan,Lijun Wu,Wen Li,Shuwen Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s472858
2024-08-20
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Mengmeng Yuan, 1 Lijun Wu, 2 Wen Li, 1 Shuwen Li 1 1 School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Shuwen Li, School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, No. 15 Feicui Road, Economic and Technological Development District, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: We intended to explore the chain mediation role of resilience and different sources of social support on the relationship between symptom interference and life satisfaction from the patient-reported perspective. Patients and Methods: Two hundred and twenty-six patients after esophagectomy were investigated using four validated scales to estimate the symptom interference, resilience, different sources of social support, and life satisfaction. The chain mediation analysis was conducted using SPSS PROCESS Macro Model 6. Results: Mediation analysis showed that symptom interference indirectly influenced life satisfaction through two significant mediating pathways: (i) resilience ( B = − 0.138, 95% CI: − 0.194 to − 0.091); (ii) the chain mediators involving in resilience and family support ( B = − 0.049, 95% CI: − 0.073 to − 0.026). Surprisingly, the mediating pathway of family support was not significant. Conclusion: Interventions for resilience and family support could mitigate the adverse effects of symptom interference in patients after esophagectomy, improving life satisfaction. Of these, resilience may be more critical in terms of the utilization of social resources than family support. Keywords: life satisfaction, oesophageal cancer, social support, resilience, symptom interference Under the most recent Global Cancer Statistics Report, oesophageal cancer ranked 7th in the global incidence of malignant tumors and 6th in overall mortality. More than 60% of the disease burden occurred in China. 1 Between 2020 and 2030, the disease burden caused by oesophageal cancer will continue to increase in China, with the number of new cases projected to rise from 324,422 to 435,958, and the number of deaths from 301,135 to 416,509. 2 Esophagectomy is currently the primary treatment for local and locally advanced disease. The procedure is technically demanding and carries a risk of severe complications. Presently, there are many different esophagectomy techniques, and in recent years, there has been a shift toward minimally invasive surgery and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. 3 However, tumor resection, although usually effective in removing the objective diseased tissue, did not always enhance the patient's postoperative quality of life (QOL). In contrast, their early QOL generally deteriorated significantly in patients after esophagectomy. 4 Patients after esophagectomy are a group with unique symptom experiences. The trauma of esophagectomy afflicted patients with multiple physical symptoms, such as dysphagia, loss of appetite, gastrointestinal reflux, and weight loss, as well as complex psychological changes, such as fear, hopelessness, and stigma. In addition, role transition disorders and refusal to participate in social activities were also ubiquitous. 5 The damage to physical and psychological resources caused by esophagectomy required a long time for recovery, which could significantly interfere with the ability of patients to perform daily activities and reduce the QOL. 6 Life satisfaction (LS), ordinarily considered a synonym or interrelated construct of QOL, was defined as a personal subjective appraisal of actual life in the light of expected life objectives and was one of the markers of postoperative recovery in oesophageal cancer patients. 7 Patient-reported symptom interference with daily life represented a composite score in the domains of physical functioning, psychological health, or social functioning, 8 the level of which may directly influence on how patients after esophagectomy rated their life satisfaction. Virtually, there was a discrepancy between the level of symptom interference as judged by medical staff and subjectively by patients. 9 Correspondingly, levels of LS as assessed by both sides may also be distinct. 10 The patient-reported outcomes instrument, which provided a quantifiable LS score without interpretation of medical staff, has been shown to help quantify patients' symptoms and enhance communication between patients and healthcare professionals. 4 Consequently, from the perspective of patient-reported outcomes, this study delved into how sympt -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal