Molecular Signatures and Sources of Fluorescent Components in Atmospheric Organic Matter in South China

Hongxing Jiang,Jiao Tang,Jun Li,Shizhen Zhao,Yangzhi Mo,Chongguo Tian,Xiangyun Zhang,Bin Jiang,Yuhong Liao,Yingjun Chen,Gan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00629
IF: 11.558
2022-10-18
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Abstract:Excitation emission matrix (EEM) spectra coupled with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) have been used to characterize brown carbon (BrC). The molecular composition of PARAFAC components is not well understood in atmospheric science, which has impeded the accurate interpretation of the chemical changes and source apportionment of BrC using EEM-PARAFAC methods. We assigned numerous formulas identified by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (both negative and positive electrospray ionization modes) to each PARAFAC-derived fluorescent component (FC) in atmospheric PM2.5 samples. Obvious differences in molecular characteristics and sources were observed between atmospheric and hydrospheric FCs, indicating the need for caution in explaining the composition and source of atmospheric FC based on hydrospheric FC. Previously assigned protein-like components (C4) and less-oxidized humic-like FC (C1) were associated mainly with highly saturated photoresistant species and less-polar anthropogenic emissions. Highly oxidized humic-like FCs were associated with aromatic and highly unsaturated/phenolic compounds (high oxygen), which were potentially influenced by biomass burning and related secondary processes. The seasonal variations in light absorption were similar to those of fluorescence intensity and the degree of humification, which were influenced by highly unsaturated/phenolic compounds (high oxygen). These linkages indicated the potential of EEM-PARAFAC for investigating the changes of light absorption, molecular composition, and source of BrC.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?