Managed Wetlands for Climate Action: Potential Greenhouse Gas and Subsidence Mitigation in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
Lydia Vaughn,Steven Deverel,Stephanie Panlasigui,Judith Drexler,Marc Olds,José Díaz,Kendall Harris,James Morris,J. Letitia Grenier,April Robinson,Donna Ball,San Francisco Estuary Institute - Aquatic Science Center,HydroFocus, Inc.,San Francisco Estuary Institute - Aquatic Science Center,US Geological Survey,HydroFocus, Inc.,HydroFocus, Inc.,San Francisco Estuary Institute - Aquatic Science Center,University of South Carolina,San Francisco Estuary Institute - Aquatic Science Center,San Francisco Estuary Institute - Aquatic Science Center,San Francisco Estuary Institute - Aquatic Science Center
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2024v22iss2art3
2024-06-12
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
Abstract:In the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (Delta), widespread drainage of historical wetlands has led to extensive subsidence and peat carbon losses, as well as high ongoing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Large-scale wetland restoration and conversion to rice fields has the potential to mitigate these effects while conferring flood protection and creating habitat for wetland species. To explore the scale of these potential benefits, this study evaluated the effects of seven Delta-wide land-use scenarios on carbon stocks, land-surface elevation, GHG emissions, and habitat. Peat mapping and data from peat cores indicate that soil carbon stocks have decreased between the early 1800s and 2010s from 288 ± 15 to 145 ± 14 million metric tons (Mt) of carbon (C). If existing land uses continue, the Delta could lose an additional 8.3 Mt C during the coming 40 years, equal to average GHG emissions of 1.2 Mt CO2 equivalents (CO2e) yr-1. Future restoration and rice-farming scenarios indicate...