Can Voluntary Disclosure Improve Financial Transparency?
程新生,谭有超
2013-01-01
Abstract:Foreign scholars have different opinions on the relationship between voluntary disclosure and financial transparency: a large number of studies have shown that information asymmetry is a necessary condition for earnings management,and voluntary disclosure improves transparency and thus reduces incentives to manage earnings because increased transparency helps investors detect earnings management. In addition,managers have incentives to make self-serving voluntary disclosures,so some scholars believe that managers would use the signaling effect of voluntary disclosure to confuse investors,which callslemon view. As an emerging market,China is in an idiosyncratic institutional environment characterized by imperfect legislation,inefficient regulatory systems. Under this institutional context,this paper investigates the relationship among voluntary disclosure and earnings quality by selecting a total of 5718 samples,that is,953 companies listed on Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchange from2005 to 2010. We find the quality of voluntary disclosure was damaged because of weak corporate governance. In this case,companies which disclose more information obtain more resources which even exceed the optimal amount they need. As a result,on the one hand,it offers more resources to controlling shareholders to tunnel the public companies. To conceal this behavior,earnings management is likely to increase significantly. On the other hand,the seeming good market image would weaken the supervision of regulators and external investors,which make it more difficult to detect controlling shareholders' behavior of tunneling public companies and earnings management. A significant positive correlation was discovered between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Furthermore,by analyzing the four earnings management manners: non-operating income,discretionary accruals,related party transaction and real earnings management activities,this article finds that since the controlling shareholders want to realize private benefits of control with the lowest cost,Chinese listed companies tend to adopt the lower-cost non-operating income,discretionary accruals and related party transaction rather than real earnings management activities with higher invisibility cost. We further research whether the compulsory disclosure moderate the relationship between voluntary disclosure and earnings quality. Some foreign scholars argue there can be validation of prior voluntary disclosures through compulsory disclosure. For example,managers' forecasts of revenues and earnings can be verified using actual realizations. However,the quality of compulsory disclosure may be damaged in China. China's capital markets have the following two salient features: One is that imperfect legislation and inefficient regulatory make it difficult to detect various disclosure violations,the deterrence force to managements' misrepresentation is insufficient,and the enforcement is not enough when punishing the opportunist and protecting the interest of minority shareholders. In addition,because most of China's public companies are state-owned enterprises,the government is playing two roles at the same time: the controlling shareholder and the regulator. Therefore,government regulators are not very effective in identifying and prosecuting disclosure fraud because of firm' political patronage. This seriously damages the effectiveness of compulsory disclosure,which reduce the effectiveness of corporate governance and the quality of voluntary disclosure. The results of this article will help investors to better understand the particularity of listed company voluntary disclosure in emerging markets,prevent investors from being misled by misstatement on one hand,so that investors could learn the present and future trends of listed company's management; on the other,the results have important policy implications.