Abstract:The prediction of river water temperature is of key importance in the field of environmental science. Water temperature datasets for low-order rivers are often in short supply, leaving environmental modelers with the challenge of extracting as much information as possible from existing datasets. Therefore, identifying a suitable modeling solution for the prediction of river water temperature with a large scarcity of forcing datasets is of great importance. In this study, five models, forced with the meteorological datasets obtained from the fifth-generation atmospheric reanalysis, ERA5-Land, are used to predict the water temperature of 83 rivers (with 98 % missing data): three machine learning algorithms (random forest, artificial neural network and support vector regression), the hybrid Air2stream model with all available parameterizations and a multiple regression. The machine learning hyperparameters were optimized with a tree-structured Parzen estimator, and an oversampling–undersampling technique was used to generate synthetic training datasets. In general terms, the results of the study demonstrate the vital importance of hyperparameter optimization and suggest that, from a practical modeling perspective, when the number of predictor variables and observed river water temperature values are limited, the application of all the models considered in this study is crucial. Basically, all the models tested proved to be the best for at least one station. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values obtained for the ensemble of all model results were 2.75±1.00 and 0.56±0.48 ∘ C, respectively. The model that performed the best overall was random forest (annual mean – RMSE: 3.18±1.06 ∘ C; NSE: 0.52±0.23 ). With the application of the oversampling–undersampling technique, the RMSE values obtained with the random forest model were reduced from 0.00 % to 21.89 % ( μ =8.57 %; σ =8.21 %) and the NSE values increased from 1.1 % to 217.0 % ( μ =40 %; σ =63 %). These results suggest that the solution proposed has the potential to significantly improve the modeling of water temperature in rivers with machine learning methods, as well as providing increased scope for its application to larger training datasets and the prediction of other types of dependent variables. The results also revealed the existence of a logarithmic correlation among the RMSE between the observed and predicted river water temperature and the watershed time of concentration. The RMSE increases by an average of 0.1 ∘ C with a 1 h increase in the watershed time of concentration (watershed area: μ =106 km 2 ; σ =153 ).

Coupled daily streamflow and water temperature modelling in large river basins

Modeling of Streamflow in a 30 Km Long Reach Spanning 5 Years Using OpenFOAM 5.X

The Critical Role of the Routing Scheme in Simulating Peak River Discharge in Global Hydrological Models

Water Flux Characterization Through Hydraulic Head and Temperature Data Assimilation: Numerical Modeling and Sandbox Experiments

A machine learning model for estimating the temperature of small rivers using satellite-based spatial data

Integrated Approach to Mekong River Flow Modeling: Data Gaps and Climate Trends

How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling

Modeling river water temperature with limiting forcing data: Air2stream v1.0.0, machine learning and multiple regression

Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Modeling for Interpreting Ecohydrological Processes in Large Arid and Semi-Arid River Basins

Modulating Factors of Hydrologic Exchanges in a Large‐scale River Reach: Insights from Three‐dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations

Improving large-scale river routing models for climate studies: the impact of ESA long-term CCI discharge products on correcting multi-model hydrological simulations

High-Performance Simulation of Dynamic Hydrologic Exchange and Implications for Surrogate Flow and Reactive Transport Modeling in a Large River Corridor

Assessing the performance of a suite of machine learning models for daily river water temperature prediction

Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of irrigation at regional scale

A Physical Process and Machine Learning Combined Hydrological Model for Daily Streamflow Simulations of Large Watersheds with Limited Observation Data

Scenario Planning Management Actions to Restore Cold Water Stream Habitat: Comparing Mechanistic and Statistical Modeling Approaches

Modeling Framework for Evaluating the Impacts of Hydrodynamic Pressure on Hydrologic Exchange Fluxes and Residence Time for a Large-Scale River Section over a Long-Term Period

Modeling Landscape Change Effects on Stream Temperature Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool

Exploring Scale‐dependent Ecohydrological Responses in a Large Endorheic River Basin Through Integrated Surface Water‐groundwater Modeling

Hydrological forecasting at impact scale: the integrated ParFlow hydrological model at 0.6 km for climate resilient water resource management over Germany

Distributed Numerical Hydrological And Hydrodynamic Modelling For Large River Catchment