Spotlight on Sleep Stage Classification Based on EEG
Isabelle Lambert,Laure Peter-Derex
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S401270
2023-06-29
Nature and Science of Sleep
Abstract:Isabelle Lambert, 1, 2 Laure Peter-Derex 3, 4 1 APHM, Timone Hospital, Sleep Unit, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, Marseille, France; 2 Aix Marseille University, INSERM, Institut de Neuroscience des Systemes, Marseille, France; 3 Center for Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Diseases, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France; 4 Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, PAM Team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Lyon, France Correspondence: Laure Peter-Derex, Centre for Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Diseases, Hospital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, 69004, France, Tel +33 4 72 07 17 69, Fax + 33 4 72 07 28 08, Email The recommendations for identifying sleep stages based on the interpretation of electrophysiological signals (electroencephalography [EEG], electro-oculography [EOG], and electromyography [EMG]), derived from the Rechtschaffen and Kales manual, were published in 2007 at the initiative of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, and regularly updated over years. They offer an important tool to assess objective markers in different types of sleep/wake subjective complaints. With the aims and advantages of simplicity, reproducibility and standardization of practices in research and, most of all, in sleep medicine, they have overall changed little in the way they describe sleep. However, our knowledge on sleep/wake physiology and sleep disorders has evolved since then. High-density electroencephalography and intracranial electroencephalography studies have highlighted local regulation of sleep mechanisms, with spatio-temporal heterogeneity in vigilance states. Progress in the understanding of sleep disorders has allowed the identification of electrophysiological biomarkers better correlated with clinical symptoms and outcomes than standard sleep parameters. Finally, the huge development of sleep medicine, with a demand for explorations far exceeding the supply, has led to the development of alternative studies, which can be carried out at home, based on a smaller number of electrophysiological signals and on their automatic analysis. In this perspective article, we aim to examine how our description of sleep has been constructed, has evolved, and may still be reshaped in the light of advances in knowledge of sleep physiology and the development of technical recording and analysis tools. After presenting the strengths and limitations of the classification of sleep stages, we propose to challenge the "EEG-EOG-EMG" paradigm by discussing the physiological signals required for sleep stages identification, provide an overview of new tools and automatic analysis methods and propose avenues for the development of new approaches to describe and understand sleep/wake states. Keywords: scoring, electrophysiology, visual, automatic, recommendation, artificial intelligence Since the first electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in humans by Hans Berger in 1929, 1 the way physiologists and sleep physicians identify wake-sleep related EEG changes has largely evolved. Until 1968, sleep stages were identified using rules that varied according to scientific teams and to breakthroughs in sleep physiology such as the description of rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep by Dement and Kleitman in 1957 and Jouvet in 1959. 2,3 In 1968, a group of sleep researchers led by Allan Rechtschaffen and Anthony Kales was created in order to establish a consensus about the way to classify sleep stages based on electrophysiology recordings. At that time, sleep studies were mostly physiological studies on healthy and young subjects aiming to describe and understand sleep mechanisms. The Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) manual of sleep staging 4 was adopted by the worldwide sleep scientific community and then by the sleep clinicians when medical sleep units started to develop in the late 1960s and 1970s 5 with exponential increase during the past two decades. With the application of R&K rules in the clinical field and the need to identify pathological conditions, as well as the digital revolution of EEG recordings in the 1990s, voices rose from the sleep medical community to amend these rules. 6 The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) organized a taskforce to adapt some criteria of original R&K manual and define pathological sleep events. Sleep staging recommendations were published in 2007 7 and repeatedly updated since then, 8 notably taking into account criticisms from the international sleep specialists community pointing out some limitations in the changes of several criteria, such as arousals, the number of EEG channels or the use of these criteria in specific populations 9–13</ -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences,clinical neurology