Electric/magnetic intervention for bone regeneration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Fangyu Zhu,Wenwen Liu,Pei Li,Han Zhao,Hom-Lay Wang,Xuliang Deng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0127

2022-09-29

Abstract:Electric/magnetic material or field is a promising strategy for bone regeneration. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to analyze the evidence regarding the efficacy of electric and magnetic intervention for bone regeneration and provide directions for further research. A comprehensive search was performed to identify the rats/rabbits/mice research that involved the electric/magnetic treatment with quantitative radiographic assessment of bone formation. Network meta-analyses were also conducted to assess different interventions and outcomes for osteogenesis. In total, there were 51 papers included in the systematic review and 19 papers in the network meta-analyses. The majority used micro-CT bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) to evaluate outcomes in rats. Results showed that placing electric/magnetic materials in situ had more prominent effects than the electric/magnetic field on bone regeneration. For all species, electrical materials with zeta potential of -53 mV proved to be the most effective in increasing BV (MD: 4.20 mm3, 95% CI: [1.72, 6.68]) and BMD (MD: 312 mg/cm3, 95% CI: [172.43, 451.57]). Magnetic materials with external magnetic fields topped in BV/TV (MD: 43%, 95% CI: [36.04, 49.96]). It also led in Tb.N (MD: 2.00 mm-1, 95% CI: [1.45, 2.55]), Tb.Th (MD: 61.00 μm, 95% CI: [44.31, 77.69]) and Tb.Sp (MD: -0.40 mm, 95% CI: [-0.56, -0.24]) on the condition of lacking electric materials. Biomaterials implantation is the most effective method for stimulating osteogenesis in rats, especially in electrical materials with negative charge. The combination of diverse interventions shows promising effects but needs further research, so does the underlying mechanism.