Abstract:The brain is not only constrained by energy needed to fuel computation, but it is also constrained by energy needed to form memories. Experiments have shown that learning simple conditioning tasks which might require only a few synaptic updates, already carries a significant metabolic cost. Yet, learning a task like MNIST to 95% accuracy appears to require at least 10 8 synaptic updates. Therefore the brain has likely evolved to be able to learn using as little energy as possible. We explored the energy required for learning in feedforward neural networks. Based on a parsimonious energy model, we propose two plasticity restricting algorithms that save energy: 1) only modify synapses with large updates, and 2) restrict plasticity to subsets of synapses that form a path through the network. In biology networks are often much larger than the task requires, yet vanilla backprop prescribes to update all synapses. In particular in this case, large savings can be achieved while only incurring a slightly worse learning time. Thus competitively restricting plasticity helps to save metabolic energy associated to synaptic plasticity. The results might lead to a better understanding of biological plasticity and a better match between artificial and biological learning. Moreover, the algorithms might benefit hardware because also electronic memory storage is energetically costly. There is increasing evidence learning already very simple tasks in animals requires substantial amounts of metabolic energy. This raises the question how much energy it costs to learn more complex tasks. For instance, the well known backpropagation algorithm always updates all synapses in the network and one can wonder if that is necessary. In the theoretical study we estimate the energy needed for an artificial neural network to learn to classify the well-known MNIST data set. We find that in particular in larger networks, substantial energy savings can be achieved, by carefully selecting which synapses to update. This is particular relevant for the neural networks in the brain that often contain millions of neurons. This study will hopefully lead to a better understanding of learning processes in biology. Moreover, as training large artificial neural networks consumes substantial amount of electric energy, the savings algorithms proposed here, might help to reduce those costs as well.

Meta-learning biologically plausible plasticity rules with random feedback pathways

Learning to Learn with Feedback and Local Plasticity

Balancing complexity, performance and plausibility to meta learn plasticity rules in recurrent spiking networks.

Evolving Decomposed Plasticity Rules for Information-Bottlenecked Meta-Learning

Using local plasticity rules to train recurrent neural networks

Discovering plasticity rules that organize and maintain neural circuits

Network bottlenecks and task structure control the evolution of interpretable learning rules in a foraging agent

Differentiable plasticity: training plastic neural networks with backpropagation

Learning to learn with backpropagation of Hebbian plasticity

Synergies Between Intrinsic and Synaptic Plasticity Based on Information Theoretic Learning

Model Based Inference of Synaptic Plasticity Rules

Self-backpropagation of synaptic modifications elevates the efficiency of spiking and artificial neural networks

Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks with Stochastic and Deterministic Synapses

Oja's plasticity rule overcomes several challenges of training neural networks under biological constraints

Competitive plasticity to reduce the energetic costs of learning

Learning arbitrary dynamics in efficient, balanced spiking networks using local plasticity rules

Contribute to balance, wire in accordance: Emergence of backpropagation from a simple, bio-plausible neuroplasticity rule

Evolving interpretable plasticity for spiking networks

Learning efficient backprojections across cortical hierarchies in real time