Abstract:Background We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of deep learning radiomics (DLR) and hand-crafted radiomics (HCR) features in differentiating acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Methods A total of 365 patients with VCFs were retrospectively analysed based on their computed tomography (CT) scan data. All patients completed MRI examination within 2 weeks. There were 315 acute VCFs and 205 chronic VCFs. Deep transfer learning (DTL) features and HCR features were extracted from CT images of patients with VCFs using DLR and traditional radiomics, respectively, and feature fusion was performed to establish the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The MRI display of vertebral bone marrow oedema was used as the gold standard for acute VCF, and the model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC).To separately evaluate the effectiveness of DLR, traditional radiomics and feature fusion in the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic VCFs, we constructed a nomogram based on the clinical baseline data to visualize the classification evaluation. The predictive power of each model was compared using the Delong test, and the clinical value of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Results Fifty DTL features were obtained from DLR, 41 HCR features were obtained from traditional radiomics, and 77 features fusion were obtained after feature screening and fusion of the two. The area under the curve (AUC) of the DLR model in the training cohort and test cohort were 0.992 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.983-0.999) and 0.871 (95% CI, 0.805-0.938), respectively. While the AUCs of the conventional radiomics model in the training cohort and test cohort were 0.973 (95% CI, 0.955-0.990) and 0.854 (95% CI, 0.773-0.934), respectively. The AUCs of the features fusion model in the training cohort and test cohort were 0.997 (95% CI, 0.994-0.999) and 0.915 (95% CI, 0.855-0.974), respectively. The AUCs of nomogram constructed by the features fusion in combination with clinical baseline data were 0.998 (95% CI, 0.996–0.999) and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.906–0.987) in the training cohort and test cohort, respectively. The Delong test showed that the differences between the features fusion model and the nomogram in the training cohort and the test cohort were not statistically significant ( P values were 0.794 and 0.668, respectively), and the differences in the other prediction models in the training cohort and the test cohort were statistically significant ( P < 0.05). DCA showed that the nomogram had high clinical value. Conclusion The features fusion model can be used for the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic VCFs, and its differential diagnosis ability is improved when compared with that when either radiomics is used alone. At the same time, the nomogram has a high predictive value for acute and chronic VCFs and can be a potential decision-making tool to assist clinicians, especially when a patient is unable to undergo spinal MRI examination.

Differentiation of benign versus malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures by different machine learning with MRI-based radiomic features

Machine learning models based on CT radiomics features for distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures in patients with malignant tumors

Radiomics Based on Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures

A 3D Radiomics-Based Artificial Neural Network Model for Benign Versus Malignant Vertebral Compression Fracture Classification in MRI

An MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fracture

Differentiating Between Multiple Myeloma and Metastasis Subtypes of Lumbar Vertebra Lesions Using Machine Learning–Based Radiomics

Differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures using conventional CT based on deep transfer learning features and hand-crafted radiomics features

Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomics combined with clinical variables in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign vertebral compression fractures

Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist's assessment

A Preliminary Study Using Spinal MRI-based Radiomics to Predict High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.

Discriminating Minimal Residual Disease Status in Multiple Myeloma Based on MRI: Utility of Radiomics and Comparison of Machine-Learning Methods.

Radiomics Model based on MRI to Differentiate Spinal Multiple Myeloma from Metastases: A Two-center Study

Machine learning based differentiation of glioblastoma from brain metastasis using MRI derived radiomics

Optimal Machine Learning Methods for Radiomic Prediction Models: Clinical Application for Preoperative T2*-weighted Images of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Machine learning–based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model for distinguishing central neurocytoma from glioma of lateral ventricle

Predicting Secondary Vertebral Compression Fracture After Vertebral Augmentation via CT-Based Machine Learning Radiomics-Clinical Model

Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

US-based radiomics analysis of different machine learning models for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4A breast lesions

Development and validation of a radiomics-based model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with lumbar compression fractures

Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Spinal Schwannoma Using Guided Attention Inference Networks on Multi-Source MRI: Comparison with Radiomics Method and Radiologist-Based Clinical Assessment

Comparison and analysis of multiple machine learning models for discriminating benign and malignant testicular lesions based on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics