Leadership Experiences of Internal Medicine Residents: A Needs Assessment for Leadership Curricula
Maureen D Lyons,Julie Oyler,Katherine Iossi,Sarah Merriam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S376089
2022-09-22
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Abstract:Maureen D Lyons, 1 Julie Oyler, 2 Katherine Iossi, 3 Sarah Merriam 4 1 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; 2 Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 3 Department of Medicine, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA; 4 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Correspondence: Maureen D Lyons, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8121, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA, Tel +1-314 362 5305, Email Purpose: Leadership development during medical training is critical. Accrediting bodies strongly recommend and residents desire leadership training. However, limited needs assessment data exist regarding trainee perceptions of and experiences with leadership training. Our objective is to describe residents' perceptions of leadership and desires for leadership training with the goal of informing effective curricular development. Patients and Methods: In 2019 a trained qualitative interviewer conducted semi-structured interviews with volunteer second-year categorical internal medicine residents recruited via email across four institutions. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and inductively coded by two independent coders. After adjudicating discrepancies, coders synthesized codes into broader themes. Final thematic analysis was triangulated with the entire author group. Results: Fourteen residents were interviewed (50% female). Few reported prior leadership training. Thematic analysis yielded six main themes. First, residents perceive "leadership" to be related to formal, assigned, hierarchical roles. Second, residents identify their own leadership primarily in the inpatient clinical setting. Third, residents identify clinical competence, emotional intelligence, and communication as important skills for effective leadership. Fourth, residents struggle to identify where leadership is currently being taught. Fifth, residents desire additional leadership development. Finally, residents prefer well-labeled, interactive methods for leadership development. Conclusion: Although residents desire leadership development, these skills are not often explicitly taught, labeled, or assessed. Curriculum developers may consider explicitly contextualizing leadership training within an "everyday leadership" framework, dovetailing leadership coaching with daily teaching workflow and feedback structures, and implementing faculty development initiatives to allow for appropriate feedback and assessment of these skills. Keywords: graduate medical education, curriculum development, needs assessment, trainee Despite lacking formal leadership training, physicians routinely lead complex multidisciplinary teams in research, education, and patient care. 1,2 Clinical leadership skills are linked to higher-quality patient care and outcomes, and an improvement in leadership skills brings about better outcomes for both patients and health systems. 3 For these reasons, graduate medical education (GME) accrediting bodies in the US and Canada 4,5 and multiple recent publications 1–3,6 have made explicit calls for formal leadership development training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education emphasizes core residency competencies that involve specific leadership skills (eg, communication, professionalism, systems-based practice) as integral to residency training. 4 In Canada, the framework for core competencies (CanMEDS) of trainees recently underwent a major shift to focus on leadership, stating "all physicians lead in their everyday practice", 7 and leadership development programs are effective in improving leadership skills, which was recently demonstrated by a high-quality randomized multicenter study. 8 Despite these recommendations, significant gaps in GME leadership training exist. Published GME leadership curricula are few and far between, and generally target select groups (eg, chief residents), 2,9 which may promote the idea that leadership is tied to formal roles and paradoxically increase the leadership gap by training those who have already demonstrated leadership capacity. Further, existing programs are heterogeneous in terms of content and delivery. 9 Of particular concern is the reported lack of description of, and agreement on, foundational concepts and theoretical frameworks -Abstract Truncated-