Predictive value of combining urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and serum homocysteine for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention
Yiling Zhai,Changjun Luo,Nianying Qin,Hongying Cao,Chunyang Dong,Zhou Huang,Dongling Huang,Fan Wang,Wanxia Wei,Jincheng Li,Jie Yang,Xueling Lu,Zhengzhuang Huang,Wei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1423836
2024-08-20
Abstract:Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) can lead to serious complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Urine N-Acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (uNAG) and serum homocysteine (sHCY) are both potential predictors for CIN detection, but their combination has not been explored. We aimed to combine uNAG and sHCY as predictors for the early detection of CIN and for prognosis prediction in patients after PCI. Methods: A total of 232 consecutive patients who underwent PCI at a university hospital were recruited for this study. According to the European Society of Urology and Reproduction (ESUR) criterion, CIN is defined as an elevation of serum creatinine (sCr) by ≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl from baseline within 48 h. We assessed the use of individual biomarkers (uNAG and sHCY) measured around PCI and their combinations for CIN detection and prognosis prediction. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive efficiency of potential predictors. Results: In total, 54 (23.28%) patients developed CIN. Concentrations of uNAG and sHCY increased significantly in CIN subjects (p < 0.05) than non-CIN. CIN could be predicted by uNAG and sHCY but not by creatinine at an early stage. At pre-PCI, 0, 12, 24, and 48 h after PCI, the AUC-ROC value of uNAG in calculating total CIN was 0.594, 0.603, 0.685, 0.657, and 0.648, respectively. The AUC-ROC value of sHCY in calculating total CIN was 0.685, 0.726, 0.771, 0.755, and 0.821, respectively. The panel of uNAG plus sHCY detected CIN with significantly higher accuracy than either individual biomarker alone and earlier than sCr. For detecting total CIN, this panel yielded AUC-ROCs of 0.693, 0.754, 0.826, 0.796, and 0.844 at pre-PCI, 0, 12, 24, and 48 h after PCI, respectively, which were superior to those of the individual biomarkers. For predicting the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days to 12 months, the AUC-ROC values for uNAG and sHCY measured before discharge were 0.637 and 0.826, respectively. The combined panel yielded an AUC-ROC of 0.832. The combined detection did not significantly enhance the predictive capability for MACE in patients with CIN. The CIN group and the non-CIN group showed no significant difference in the Coronary Heart Disease Intensive Care Unit (CCU) stay time, hospital stay time, demand for renal replacement therapy, CCU mortality rate, and in-hospital mortality rate. Conclusions: The uNAG and sHCY panel demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity for predicting the diagnosis and prognosis of CIN in patients after PCI, earlier than sCr. The combination of these biomarkers revealed a significantly superior discriminative performance for CIN detection and prognosis compared to using uNAG or sHCY alone.