Abstract:Memory Studies, Ahead of Print. Protest and memory activism have been shown to have the potential to demystify the heritage spectacle through de-monumentalisation and de-contextualisation of the dominant and normalised narrative of the past, with the purpose to oppose a mnemonic hegemony and open the space for a cultural and social reimagining of both the past and the present. The protests that took place in North Macedonia in 2016 and the #Protestiram movement are examples of social movements in which newly installed cultural-historical objects and statues served as a canvas upon which protesters could express their socio-political motivations and demands. Protests offer a moment to re-examine given structures and routines and often represent the beginning of a new reality that refuses to accept the existing 'stable scheme' as normal. My interest in this article lies in exploring the means by which memory and heritage, as presented in the public space, influence meaning-making not only in a contemporary context but also in projecting a certain future – and thus how they can provoke resistance and revolt. In the context of the Macedonian protests from 2016, I look at how statues and newly produced megalomaniacal heritage bear witness to the social struggle during the protests. A further avenue of enquiry seeks to reveal the ultimate goal of these acts of de-monumentalisation and re-contextualisation of heritage as used by the protesters: what did they hope to achieve? My approach combines both the political logic of hegemonic relationships of Laclau and Debord's concept of spectacle and the protest as an interruption of that spectacle. The use of the term 'spectacle' here suggests there is little actual history at play. In my analysis, I also apply concepts that have been used in memory studies in relation to social movements, including hegemonic memories, exclusive remembrance, counter memories, counter monuments and memories from below.

In search of consent: Agency, audience and identity in memory activism

Memory, activism and the arts in Asia and the Pacific

Activist turns: The (in)compatibility of scholarship and transformative activism

Remembering activism: Means and ends

Media memory activism in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina

Dangerous remembering in volatile spaces: Activist memory work in the Iranian context

Collectivizing justice: Participatory witnessing, sense memory, and emotional communities

Memory, storytelling and the digital archive: Revitalizing community and regional identities in the virtual age

Challenging the meaning of the past from below: A typology for comparative research on memory activists

Disappearances, dissident memory and magic: Sandya Ekneligoda's struggle for justice

Solidarity: Memory work, periodicals and the protest lexicon in the long 1960s

Mnemonic adoption and rejection: How activists remember and forget previous mobilisations

The digital turn in memory studies

Cultural Memory and Trauma: Commemorating the Past in Post-Conflict Bosnia Herzegovina

Vision of transmedia narratives of memory. Case study of the digital platform Museum of Memory and Human Rights of Chile

When the past meets the present: The role of memory sites in time of crisis in Chile

The return of suppressed memories in Eastern Europe: Locality and unsilencing difficult histories

Finding place in Northeast and Southeast Asia: Collective memory construction of the marginalized, disenfranchised, and dislocated

From “memory wars” to shared identities: Conceptualizing the transnationalisation of collective memory

Activists' interventions in the heritage spectacle during the Macedonian protests of 2016

Remembering to Prevent: The Preventive Capacity of Public Memory