Abstract:AbstractWe examine the performance of nearly 2000 actively managed equity funds using attribution analysis, a process commonly used by mutual funds to isolate management contributions from the sector allocation and stock selection components of fund returns. For the period 1994 through 2005 we show that, on average, potential gains from sector allocation were offset by poor stock selection. However, equity managers excelled at sector allocation and stock selection during the bear market of 2000-2002. Over the 12-year sample period, returns from actively managed funds dominated returns from passive portfolios with less risk, primarily because of their performance during the bear market.© 2012 Academy of Financial Services. All rights reserved.JEL classification: G11; G2Keywords: Managed mutual funds; Attribution performance1. IntroductionManagers of actively managed funds require sound and reliable performance measurement to evaluate and guide their investment decisions. Performance evaluations reveal how managers are performing relative to their competition, how they should be rewarded, and whether changes in strategy are required. Sound and reliable evaluation also provides individual investors with information necessary to guide their financial planning.Performance typically uses variations on the Sharpe (1966) index and alphas derived from either the single-index market model or multifactor models. However, performance attribution or attribution analysis, which is widely used in the fund industry for compensation purposes, differs from widely studied performance models in that it uses a fund-specific benchmark, or bogey, to evaluate fund performance. Based on the fund's bogey, the equity fund can precisely determine how their managers' sector allocation and security selection decisions each contribute to the fund's total return.1 While fund managers are commonly judged on their performance relative to an index such as the SP while factor derived alphas are not. Why? Because attribution analysis differs from factor-based models by providing estimates of both sector allocation and stock selection components of a fund's return regardless of the fund's objective or investment strategy. Accurately tracking both components enables active fund managers with a variety of investment objectives to effectively monitor them, and to make appropriate changes as information arrives. Importantly, if data services provided performance data based on attribution analysis, investors could more effectively monitor management's potential by observing their ability to generate wealth from each attribute.Recent research challenges the assumption that betas derived from historical data represent investor risk. Fama and French (2007) report that their size (SMB) and value (HML) factors contain excess positive returns resulting from unanticipated higher growth in U.S. business productivity over the last century. This growth represents exploitable opportunities in sector allocation and stock selection for fund managers who are able to anticipate forthcoming productivity gains. Additionally, Moskowitz and Grinblatt (1999) conclude that astute investors can capture the Carhart (1997) momentum factor premiums (PYR) of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993). The same explanation applies for the single-factor market model, which incorporates the net impact of the three remaining Carhart factors, plus any unobserved priced factors representing productivity gains or losses because of changes in expected cash flows and/or risk. …

Beyond active share: Boosting fund performance through common holdings with same-benchmark mutual funds

Use of active peer benchmarks in assessing UK mutual fund performance and performance persistence

Construct sparse portfolio with mutual fund's favourite stocks in China A share market

Mutual Fund Performance: Using Bespoke Benchmarks to Disentangle Mandates, Constraints and Skill

Mutual Fund Performance Attribution: 1994-2005

Double-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance

Managerial Activeness and Mutual Fund Performance

A Reliable Performance Measure to Differentiate China's Actively Managed Open-End Equity Mutual Funds

Performance attribution of mutual funds in India: outperformance or mis‐representation?

Patient Capital Outperformance: The Investment Skill of High Active Share Managers Who Trade Infrequently

Does Prospect Theory Explain Mutual Fund Performance? Evidence from China

Why do investors buy shares of actively managed equity mutual funds? Considering the Correct Reference Portfolio from an Uninformed Investor's Perspective 1, 2

Similar Stocks

An Examination of the Performance of the Trades and Stock Holdings of Fund Managers: Further Evidence

Do Active Funds Perform Better in Down Markets? New Evidence from Cross-Sectional Study

Holding-Based Evaluation upon Actively Managed Stock Mutual Funds in China

The role of passive effects in the relationship between active management and short-term performance: Evidence from mutual fund portfolio holdings

Active Fundamental Performance

In Search for Managerial Skills Beyond Common Performance Measures

Performance of active portfolio managers when the benchmark is not observable

Does Active Management Improve Mutual Fund's Performance?