Abstract:Pairwise and network meta‐analyses of 27 non‐randomized studies revealed that use of tissue sealants (i.e., dural sealants and fibrin glues) in skull base reconstruction following the endoscopic endonasal approach may not significantly reduce risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage either in absolute comparisons with nonuse or relative comparisons among tissue sealant types and brands. Further investigation of prospective randomized design may be warranted to thoroughly elucidate the clinical value of adjunct sealants in endoscopic skull base surgery. Objective Despite significant advances in understanding of skull base reconstruction principles, the role of tissue sealants in modifying postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak outcomes remains controversial. We evaluate postoperative CSF leak incidence associated with tissue sealant use in skull base defect repair during endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS). Data Sources Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Review Methods Systematic review and meta‐analysis of risk differences (RD). A search strategy identified original studies reporting CSF leakage following ESBS with disaggregation by tissue sealant use and/or type. Results 27 non‐randomized studies (n = 2,403) were included for qualitative and meta‐analysis. Reconstruction with a tissue sealant did not significantly reduce postoperative CSF leak risk compared with reconstruction without sealant (RD[95% CI] = 0.02[−0.01, 0.05]). Sub‐analyses of dural sealant (−0.02[−0.11, 0.07]) and fibrin glue (0.00[−0.07, 0.07]) compared with no sealant were similarly unremarkable. Postoperative CSF leakage was not significantly modulated in further sub‐analyses of DuraSeal (0.02[−0.02, 0.05]), Adherus (−0.03[−0.08, 0.03]), or Bioglue (−0.06[−0.23, 0.12]) versus no dural sealant use, or Tisseel/Tissucol versus fibrin glue nonuse (0.00[−0.05, 0.05]). No significant association was seen comparing dural sealant use versus fibrin glue use on pairwise (0.01[−0.03, 0.05]) or network meta‐analysis (−0.01[−0.05, 0.04]). Limitations in source literature prevented sub‐analyses stratified by leak characteristics, defect size and location, and accompanying reconstruction materials. Conclusion Tissue sealant use did not appear to impact postoperative CSF leak incidence when compared with nonuse. Higher quality studies are warranted to thoroughly elucidate the clinical value of adjunct sealant use in endoscopic skull base reconstruction. Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope, 2024

Utilization of Polydioxanone Plate for Endoscopic Anterior Skull Base Repair: Operative Technique and Long-Term Cohort Outcomes

Deployment of a Bioabsorbable Plate As the Rigid Buttress for Skull Base Repair after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery.

Our Experience in Trans Nasal Endoscopic Repair of Anterior Skull Base Defects Reinforced with Multiple Layers of Graft Materials

Tissue Sealant Impact on Skull Base Reconstruction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Use of Rescue Flaps in the Reconstruction of Anterior Skull Base Defects

Endoscopic Reconstruction of Skull Base Defects Using Tutoplast

Combined Use of a Gasket Seal Closure and a Vascularized Pedicle Nasoseptal Flap Multilayered Reconstruction Technique for High-Flow Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks after Endonasal Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Dural Closure Method Using Dural Suture and Polyglycolic Acid Nonwoven Fabric in the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

A Stratified Algorithm for Skull Base Reconstruction With Endoscopic Endonasal Approach.

Transmastoid Repair of Minor Skull Base Defects with Flexible Hydroxyapatite Sheets

Resorbable PLLA-PGA plate and screw fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery: clinical experience in 1883 patients

Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Skull Base Defects Following Endonasal Pituitary Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study

American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement part 1: Skull base reconstruction following endoscopic skull base surgery

The selection of methods and materials in skull base reconstruction

Single Layer and Double Layer Duraplasty for the Management of Persistent Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Following Frontal Sinus Trauma: A Retrospective Study

Polyetheretherketone Implant Cranioplasty for Large Cranial Defects: A Seven-Year Follow-Up

Comparative Analysis of Duroplasty Techniques in Decompressive Craniectomy: The CANDID Study

[Skull Base Reconstruction and Rehabilitation].

[An Endoscopic Approach to Reconstruction of Skull Base Defects Using a Vascular Pedicled Nasoseptal Mucoperiosteal Flap].

Clinical and technical factors in endoscopic skull base surgery associated with reconstructive success

Long-term Follow-Up Results of Dural Reconstruction Without Bone Graft at Anterior Skull-Base Defects